关于《韩非子》篇目真伪考辨的几点思考

Some Thoughts about the Textual Research on the authenticity of Han Feizi's Content Titles

《韩非子》篇目真伪的考辨,历来是其研究领域中的一个难点。从方法论的角度反观前人考辨的方法,有几个问题是今后考辨工作中所应关注并遵循的:一,《本传》关于韩非著作的著录基本是可信的;二,没有直接的证据,《韩非子》中的篇目不应被轻易否定掉;三,对于已经被证实的伪作,在没有充分的反证之前,不可轻易推翻已有的结论;四,辨伪应综合多方面的材料,尽量避免以单一证据立论。

The textual research on the authenticity of Han Feizi＇s content titles has always been a difficult point in the research fields. Contrasting in the way of the former scholar＇s research from the perspective of methodology, there are some principles that should been pay a close attention and abide by. Firstly, Ben zhuan about the recording of Han Feizi＇s works is basically true. Secondly, the content titles of Hart Feizi should not been easily denied if couldn＇ t offer a direct testimony. Thirdly, concerning with the false works which have been confirmed, we should not repudiate the former conclusion rashly if we can＇ t offer ample evidences. Finally, we should synthesize the materials of many aspects, and avoid to present our arguments depend on a single testimony.