期刊文献+

硫营养对重金属胁迫下玉米和小麦根系导水率的影响 被引量:7

Effects of Sulfur Nutrition on Root Hydraulic Conductivity of Maize and Wheat under Heavy Metals Stress
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以‘秦单4号’玉米和‘小偃22’小麦为供试材料,通过室内玉米水培和小麦盆栽试验,采用静态压力室法测定了不同硫营养水平与不同重金属胁迫处理下根系导水率(Lpr)的变化。结果表明:玉米Lpr经100μmol/LHg2+、Zn2+、Cu2+胁迫处理后分别降低到CK的13%、79%和45%,Cu2+、Zn2+对其Lpr的抑制效应分别为同浓度Hg2+的62.9%及24.3%;施硫处理的玉米Lpr在无Cu2+胁迫条件下都极显著高于无硫处理,且低硫处理显著较高,在Cu2+胁迫条件下亦都极显著高于无硫处理,并且Cu2+胁迫对其Lpr的抑制效应随着硫浓度增大而逐渐减小;不施硫和施硫处理的小麦Lpr在500mg/kgZn2+胁迫下分别比相应CK降低36.89%和37.71%,在400mg/kgCu2+胁迫下则分别比相应CK降低了34.61%和12.29%。研究发现,重金属Cu2+、Zn2+对玉米和小麦根系导水率具有显著的抑制作用且Cu2+>Zn2+,施硫对Cu2+胁迫下的玉米和小麦根系导水率都具有显著的保护作用,并随硫浓度增加而增强。 At different heavy metal levels and different sulfur levels,with Hoagland solution and pot experi- ments,the hydraulic conductance (Lpr) of maize and wheat of roots were determined in a pressure cham- ber. The results showed that Cu^2+ and Zn^2+ restrain Lpr significantly. At the same concentration,the inhib- itive effect of Cu^2+ is about 62.9% of Hg^2+ ,the usual aquaporins inhibitor,and that of Zn^2+ is only around 24.3% of Hg^2+. The order of the impacts of these three heavy metals to Lpr was: Hg^2+ 〉Cu^2+〉Zn^2+. Without heavy metals threats,there were no significant distinctions between various sulfdr nutrition treat- ments. Under stress of Cu^2+ ,sulfur nutrition showed the protective function to the Lp, of maize root, and this effect enhanced with the increase of sulfur concentration. In pot experiments, according to Third Class Farmland Environmental Quality Standard for Soils,500 mg/kg Zn^2+ and 400 mg/kg Cu^2+ were added into the soil. The Lpr of wheat root was inhibited heavily in this condition. Compared to CK, under Zn^2+ stress the Lpr declined 36.89% and 37.71% under -S (without sulfur addition) and 3-8 (added sulfur) treat- ments respectively, under Cu^2+ stress the Lp, fall 34.61% and 12.29% under -S and 3-S treatments.Therefore, +S treatment could obviously maintain the Lpr of wheat root under Cu^2+ stress.
出处 《西北植物学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第11期2257-2262,共6页 Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica
基金 西北农林科技大学创新团队项目
关键词 硫营养 重金属胁迫 根系导水率(Lpr) 玉米 小麦 sulfur nutrition heavy metals stress root hydraulic conductance (Lpr) maize wheat
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1ZIMMERMANN H M,STEDULE E.Apoplastic transport across young maize roots:effect of the exodermis[J].Planta,1998,206:7-19.
  • 2MENCUCCINI M,COMSTOCK J.Vulnerability to cavitation in populations of two desert species,Hymenoclea salsola and Ambrosia dumosa,from different climatic regions[J].Journal of Experimental Botany,1997,48:1 323-1 334.
  • 3TYREEM T,SALLEO S,N ARDINIA,et al.Refilling of embolized vessels in young stems of laurel.Do we need a new paradigm[J].Plant Physiology,1999,120:11-21.
  • 4沈玉芳,王保莉,曲东,陈荣府.水分胁迫下磷营养对玉米苗期根系导水率的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2002,30(5):11-15. 被引量:26
  • 5MAGGIO A,JOLY R J.Effect of mercuric chloride on the hydraulic conductivity of tomato root system[J].Plant Physiology,1995,109:331-335.
  • 6HOARAU J,BARTHES L,BOUSSER A.Effect of nitrate on water transfer across roots of nitrogen pre-starved maize seedlings[J].Planta,1996,200:405-415.
  • 7沈玉芳,曲东,王保莉.干旱低磷胁迫对不同品种小麦根系导水率的影响[J].西北植物学报,2004,24(9):1578-1582. 被引量:10
  • 8沈玉芳,曲东,王保莉.磷对大麦根系导水率的调节作用研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2005,23(1):81-84. 被引量:5
  • 9沈玉芳,曲东,王保莉,张兴昌.干旱胁迫下磷营养对不同作物苗期根系导水率的影响[J].作物学报,2005,31(2):214-218. 被引量:25
  • 10KARMOKER J L,CLARKSON D T,SAKER L R,et al.Sulphate depresses the transport of nitrogen the xylem and hydraulic conductivity of barley roots[J].Planta,1991,185:269-278.

二级参考文献93

  • 1曲东,尉庆丰.陕西几种代表性土壤硫形态与土壤性质的关系[J].土壤通报,1996,27(1):16-18. 被引量:14
  • 2李德全,邹琦,程炳嵩.冬麦叶片的渗透调节能力与产量及抗旱性的关系[J].植物学通报,1996,13(A00):46-50. 被引量:9
  • 3朱美君 阎隆飞 等.水通道蛋白的研究进展.生命科学研究进展(第1集)[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社,1996.58-72.
  • 4刘崇群 曹淑卿 吴锡军 国际硫研究所 中国科学院南京土壤研究所.中国土壤硫素状况和对硫的需求[A].国际硫研究所,中国科学院南京土壤研究所.硫镁和微量元素在作物营养平衡中的作用国际学术讨论会论文集[C].成都:成都科技出版社,1995.1-18.
  • 5曲东 王鹏新 尉庆丰 国际硫研究所 中国科学院南京土壤研究所 澳大利亚国际农业研究中心.石灰性土壤中硫及酸化对土壤养分的影响[A].国际硫研究所,中国科学院南京土壤研究所,澳大利亚国际农业研究.中国农业硫肥研究进展和需求展望国际研讨会论文集[C].Washington DC: The Sulphur Institute,1999.121-127.
  • 6朱美君 王学臣 陈珈 阎隆飞 王学臣.水通道蛋白研究的进展[A].阎隆飞,王学臣.生命科学研究进展[C](第一集)[C].北京:中国农业大学出版社,1996.58-72.
  • 7[1]Margoshes M,Vallee BL,J Am Chem Soc,1957,29:4813~4814.
  • 8[2]Rauser WE, Ann Rev Biochem, 1990, 57:61~86.
  • 9[3]Andrews GK. Prog Food Nutr Science, 1990.14:193~258.
  • 10[4]Hamer DH,Ann Rev Biochem, 1986,55:913~951.

共引文献171

同被引文献213

引证文献7

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部