期刊文献+

北京山区资源环境的生态承载力分析 被引量:17

The Analysis of the Ecological Carrying Capacity of the Environment of Beijing's Mountain Region
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文以北京市七个山区县作为分析的目标区域,应用目前国际通行的生态足迹分析法计算了该区域资源环境的生态足迹,在扣除维护生物多样性与生态保护所需的土地面积后,计算结果揭示了北京市七个山区县人均生态赤字情况。本文的基本结论是:目标区域的生态足迹需求超出了地区资源承载力,存在严重的生态赤字,并且生态赤字有扩大的趋势。笔者建议各级政府应当采取更加有效的措施,促进山区生态和经济社会的和谐发展。 Taking the 7 mountain regions in Beijing as the object regions, this article calculats the ecological footprints of resource environment. Deducting the land area of preserving the biological diversity, the calculating result shows the ecological deficit in these 7 mountain regions. The conclusion is that the requirement in ecological footprints exceeds the fundamental carrying capacity, and there is a critical ecological deficit which is keeping expanding. In the end, it suggests the government should adopt more efficient measures to accelerate the harmonious development of mountain regional ecology and economy.
出处 《北京社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第6期53-57,共5页 Social Sciences of Beijing
关键词 生态足迹 资源承载力 生态赤字 和谐发展 ecological footprint fundamental carrying capacity ecological deficit harmonious development
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献33

  • 1闵庆文,余卫东,成升魁.商丘市居民生活消费生态足迹的时间序列分析[J].资源科学,2004,26(5):125-131. 被引量:52
  • 2熊德国,鲜学福,姜永东.生态足迹理论在区域可持续发展评价中的应用及改进[J].地理科学进展,2003,22(6):618-626. 被引量:191
  • 3Rees W E. Ecological footprint and appropriated carrying capacity:what urban economics leaves out [J]. Environment and Urbanization, 1992, 4(2): 121 - 130.
  • 4Wackernagel M and Rees W E. Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth [ M ] . Gabriola Island: New SocietyPublishers, 1996.
  • 5Erb K-H. Actual land demand of Austria 1926 - 2000: a variation on ecological footprint assessments [J]. Land Use Policy, 2004, 21(3): 247 - 259.
  • 6Haberl H, Erb K-H, Krausmann F. How to calculate and interpret ecological footprints for long periods of time: the case of Austria 1926- 1995[J]. Ecological Economics, 2001, 38:25-45.
  • 7Van Vuuren D P and Smeets E M W. Ecological footprints of Benin,Bhutan, Costa Rica and the Netherlands [ J ]. Ecological Economics,2000, 34(234): 115 - 130.
  • 8World Wildlife Fund. Living planet report. 2000[EB/OL]. http://www. panda. org/downloads/general/lpr. 2000. pdf, 2000-10-10.
  • 9World Wildlife Fund. Living planet report. 2002[EB/OL]. http://www. panda. org/downloads/general/LPR2002. pdf, 2002-06-10.
  • 10World Wildlife Fund. Living planet report. 2004[EB/OL]. http://www. panda. org/downloads/general/lpr 2004. pdf, 2004-10-10.

共引文献960

同被引文献357

引证文献17

二级引证文献433

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部