期刊文献+

关于海权与大国崛起问题的若干思考 被引量:26

Reflections on Seapower and the Rise of Great Powers
原文传递
导出
摘要 在西方国际关系理论中,关于海权与大国崛起关系的分析有以下两个值得注意的命题及其引发的问题:第一,关于海权是全球性大国的必要条件的命题。这一命题引发的问题是如何科学理解海权对大国崛起的影响。对此,作者指出多数西方学者都是结合经济、技术和制度的创新等其他因素来强调海权重要性的;历史也表明海权本身并不具有确保国家强盛的神奇功效,国家盛衰归根结底取决于社会生产方式的活力以及制度创新的能力。第二,新兴海权国家尤其是陆海复合国家挑战既有的世界海洋霸权,从而引发国际体系的冲突与动荡这一命题。作者通过实证分析指出,并不存在新兴海权国家与既有海洋霸权冲突的历史逻辑,其关键取决于新兴国家大战略的选择;同时还必须考虑到不同时期国际体系的总体特征和时代主题的不同。解释模式可以解释历史上的两次更迭,并为未来世界经济格局的预测提供一个视角。 In Western international relations theories,there are two remarkable propositions and related issues on seapower and the rise of great powers.The first proposition is that seapower is a necessary condition for global power.Relatededly,there is the issue of how to understand scientifically the effects of seapower on the rise of great powers.The author points out that most Western scholars emphasize the importance of seapower,but they also emphasize the importance of the economy,technology,and institutional innovation.However,history indicates that there are no supernatural effects of seapower on the rise of great powers.The second proposition is that the new seapower countries,especially the land-sea countries,challenge the existing global hegemony of the sea,often leading to conflict and turbulence.Based on empirical analysis,the author concludes that there is no historical logic to conflict between new seapowers and the existing global hegemony of the sea,and the key issue lies in the strategic choice of the new seapowers as well as in the different characteristics and themes of the international system at various times.
作者 刘中民
出处 《世界经济与政治》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第12期6-14,共9页 World Economics and Politics
基金 2006年教育部"新世纪优秀人才支持计划"项目成果 2004年教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目"世界海洋政治的发展与中国海洋战略选择"(04JJDZH017)阶段性成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 1Martin Wight, Power Politics, Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1978
  • 2Robert Gilpin, War and Change in World Politics, New York : Cambridge University Press, 1981
  • 3John J.Mearsheimer, The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, New York : W. W. Norton & Company Ltd. , 2001.
  • 4Fareed Zakaria, From Wealth to Power: The Unusual Origins of America's World Role, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1988, p. 1.
  • 5James E. Auer, Robyn Lim, "The Maritime Basis of American Security in East Asia," Naval War College Review, Vol. 54, No. 1,2001, pp. 39 -47.
  • 6James E. Auer, Robyn Lim, "The Maritime Basis of American Security in East Asia," pp. 43 -45.
  • 7[美]理查德·伯恩斯坦,罗斯·芒罗著,隋丽君等译.《即将到来的美中冲突》,北京:新华出版社,1997年版,第48页,第2-3页.
  • 8张文木.经济全球化与中国海权[J].战略与管理,2003(1):86-94. 被引量:41
  • 9[美]马汉著,萧伟中,梅然译.《海权论》,北京:中国言实出版社,1997年版,第2-3页.
  • 10George Modelski and William R. Thompson, Seapower in Global Politics, 1949 - 1993, Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1988, pp. 3 - 26.

二级参考文献29

  • 1Gorge Moderski and William R. Thompson,Seapower in Global Politics, 1494-1993, Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1988, P.3-26.
  • 2William L. Langer, The Diplomacy of Imperialism 1890-1902, Vol. II, New York: Alfred. A. Knopf,1935, P.434-435.
  • 3George Monger, The End of Isolation: British Foreign Policy 1900-1907, Thomas Nelson & Sons Ltd.,1963, P.104-107.
  • 4George Monger, The End of Isolation: British Foreign Policy 1900-1907, Thomas Nelson & Sons Ltd.,1963, P.72.
  • 5Thomas McCormack, America's Half-Century:United States Foreign Policy in the Cold War, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989, P.45.
  • 6[美国]A.T.马汉.《海权论》.中译本,中国言实出版社1997年版,第159页.
  • 7[美国]艾·塞·马汉.《海军战略》.中译本,商务印书馆2003年版,前言,第8页.
  • 8[美国]A.T.马汉.《海权对历史的影响1660-1783》,第218页.
  • 9[美国]艾·塞·马汉.《海军战略》,前言,第7页.
  • 10George Modelski and William R.Thompson,Seapower in Global Politics,1494-1993,Macmillan Press,1988,p.106,p.25.

共引文献144

同被引文献297

引证文献26

二级引证文献186

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部