期刊文献+

一种面向可信决策的风险信任平衡模型研究 被引量:3

Balancing Risk and Trust in Trust-Based Decision Making
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在不确定环境中,风险和信任是影响可信决策的关键因素。对于风险和信任的相互关系尚未达成共识,而已有的信任模型或者风险管理手段或多或少存在一些不足。本文在分析已有研究成果的基础上,论述了风险和信任在可信决策中的相互关系,并基于主观逻辑建立了一个风险信任平衡模型。该模型将风险和信任量化为风险观点和信任观点,通过安全策略定义事务重要性和可信决策的相关参数,基于信任关系优先准则进行可信决策。本文提出的风险信任平衡模型可以对分析风险和信任相互关系进行量化,也可以应用于基于信任和风险的安全模型和安全决策中。 among the various human factors impinging upon making a decision in an uncertain environment, risk and trust are surely crucial ones. It is still an open issue for the relationship between risk and trust. The researchers focus on either trust models or risk assessment methods,hut ignore the other side of uncertain decision-making. In this paper, we further the study of risk and trust. First, the relationship between risk and trust is thoroughly analyzed in the trust-based decision making process. Second, a risk and trust balancing model is proposed based on subjective logic. In this model, risk and trust are represented as the risk opinion and the trust opinion, and the importance of transaction is defined, The threshold set and weights are assigned according to the security policies defined by trustor. Meanwhile, the trust-based decision is made according to the ordering of trust relationships. The model we propose can be applied in the security models and secure decision-making based on risk and trust.
出处 《计算机工程与科学》 CSCD 2007年第4期31-35,共5页 Computer Engineering & Science
基金 国家863计划资助项目(2003AA142010) 国家自然科学基金资助项目(90104001)
关键词 信任 风险 风险信任平衡模型 观点 可信决策 trust risk risk and trust balancing model opinion trust-based decision making
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Josang A,Presti S L.Analysing the Relationship Between Risk and Trust[A].Proc of the 2nd Int'l Conf on Trust Management[C].2004.135-145.
  • 2Beth T,Borcherding M,Klein B.Valuation of Trust in Open Networks[A].Proc of the European Symp on Research in Computer Security[C].1994.3-18.
  • 3Abdul-Rahman A,Halles S.A Distributed Trust Model[A].Proc of the New Security Paradigms Workshop[C].1997.48-60.
  • 4Josang A.A Logic for Uncertain Probabilities[J].International Journal of Uncertainty,Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems,2001,9(3):279-311.
  • 5Stoneburner,G,Goguen A,Feringa A.Risk Management Guide for Information Technology Systems[R].NIST Special Publication 800-30,National Institute of Standards and Technology,2002.
  • 6Raptis D,Dimitrakos T,Gran B A,et al.The Coras Approach for Model-Based Risk Management Applied to E-Commerce Domain[A].Proc of the IFIP TC6/TC11 6th Joint Working Conf on Communications and Multimedia Security[C].2002.169-181.
  • 7Manchala D W.Trust Metrics,Models and Protocols for Electronic Commerce Transactions[A].Proc of the 18th Int'l Conf on Distributed Computing Systems[C].1998.312-321
  • 8Povey D.Developing Electronic Trust Policies Using a Risk Management Model[A].Proc of the Int'l Exhibition and Congress on Secure Networking[C].1999.1-6.
  • 9Dimitrakos T.A Service-Oriented Trust Management Framework[A].Proc of the Int'l Workshop on Trust,Reputation,and Security:Theories and Practice[C].2002.53-72.
  • 10Cahill V.Using Trust for Secure Collaboration in Uncertain Environment[J].IEEE Pervasive Computing,2003,2(3):52-61.

共引文献2

同被引文献21

  • 1HUANGChen-lin HUHua-ping.Extension of Subjective Logic for Time-Related Trust[J].Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences,2005,10(1):56-60. 被引量:3
  • 2Jφsang A, Ismail R, Boyd C. A survey of trust and reputation systems for online service provision[J]. Journalof Decision Support Systems, 2007, 43 (2): 618-644.
  • 3Mui L, Mohtashemi M, Halberstadt A. Notions ofreputation in multi-agents systems:a review[C]// Proceedings of The First International Joint Confer- ence on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Sys- tems, 2002:280-287.
  • 4Dellarocas C. Immunizing online reputation reporting systems against unfair ratings and discriminatory be- havior [C]//ACM Conference on Electronic Com- merce 2000 : 150-157.
  • 5Whitby A, Josang A, Indulska J. Filtering out un- fair ratings in Bayesian reputation systems[J]. The Icfain Journal of Management Research, 2005, 4(2) : 48-64.
  • 6Zhang J, Sensoy M, Cohen R. A detailed comparison of probabilistic approaches for coping with unfair rat- ings in trust and reputation systems[C]//Proceed- ings of Sixth Annual Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust, IEEE Computer Society, 2008:189-200.
  • 7Jφsang A, Presti S. Analyzing the relationship be- tween risk and trust[C]//Proceedings of the 2nd In- ternational Conference on Trust Management, 2004:135-145.
  • 8Liu B D. Uncertainty theory[ C] ffStudies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2007,154: 205-234.
  • 9Husserl E. Formal and transcendental logic[ M]. Hague, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 1969.
  • 10Jcsang A. Prospectives for modelling trust in information security [ C ] //Proceedings of the 2nd Australasian Conference on information Security and Privacy. London, UK: Springer-Verlag, 1997:2-13.

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部