期刊文献+

投资者恶性增资行为的控制机制探讨——基于原生性认知和负反馈信息明确化的考察 被引量:3

A Probe into the Mechanism for Controlling the Vicious Behavior of Investors' Increasing Funds
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文探讨了在资本预算项目决策中,投资者恶性增资行为的控制机制。文中首先提出了同时使用相对降低投资者的原生性认知和使负反馈信息明确化两种途径,可有效地抑制投资者的恶性增资行为。采用综合设定项目最低报酬率方式可同时达到这一目的。其次,本文运用模拟实验法对该观点进行了验证。验证结果表明:综合设定项目最低报酬率的方式既能有效地抑制恶性增资行为,又可以使设定的最低报酬率与公司期望的最低报酬率无显著差异。 This paper explores the mechanism for controlling investors'behavior of increasing capital viciously in the decision -making of capital budget projects. First of all this paper proposes that taking simuhaneously the two measures of decreasing relatively the original cognition of investors and clarifying negative feedback information can restrain effectively investors'behavior of increasing capital viciously. Taking the means of lowest return rate for comprehensively predetermined projects can achieve this purpose at the same time. Then using simulating experimentation this paper tests the point of view. The result shows that the method of lowest return rate for comprehen- sively predetermined projects can both restrain investors'behavior of increasing funds viciously and make the predetermined lowest return rate close to the lowest return rate expected by companies.
作者 唐洋
机构地区 南开大学商学院
出处 《经济经纬》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第4期67-70,共4页 Economic Survey
关键词 恶性增资 原生性认知 负反馈 自辩理论 vicious capital increase original cognition negative feedback self-defence theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Brockner.J.,M.C.Shaw,and J.Z.Rubin.1979.Factors affecting withdrawal from an escalating conflict:Quitting before it's too late[J].Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 15:492-503.
  • 2Brockner.J.and J.Z.Rubin.1985.Entrapment in Escalating Conflicts:A Social Psychological Analysis.New York.NY:Springer-Veriag.
  • 3DeBono.J.1997.Divisional cost of equity capital[J].Management Accounting 75(10):40-41.
  • 4Festinger.L.1957.A theory of Cognitive Dissonance.Evanston.IL:row Peterson.
  • 5Garland.H.,C.A.Sandefur.and A.C.Rogers.1990.De-escalation of commitment in oil exploration:When sunk costs and negative feedback coincide[J].Journal of Applied Psychology 75(6):721-728.
  • 6Kiesler.C.A.1971.The Psychology of Commitment.New York.NY:Academic Press.
  • 7Mandy M.Cheng,Axel K-D.Sehulz,Peter F.Luckett,Peter Booth.2003.The Effects of Hurdle Rates on the Level of Escalation of Commitment in Capital Budgeting[J].Behavioral Research In Accounting 15:63-85.
  • 8Rutledge.R.W.and K.E.Karim.1999.The influence of self interest and ethical considerations on managers' evaluation judgement[J].Accounting,Organizations and Society 24(2):173-184.
  • 9Staw.B.M.1976.Knee-deep in the big muddy:A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action[J].Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 16:27-44.
  • 10Teger.A.1980.Too Much invested to Quit.New York.NY:Pergamon.

共引文献15

同被引文献45

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部