期刊文献+

论反倾销保护对企业R&D投入的影响 被引量:5

On the Effect of Antidumping Protection on the R&D Investment of Enterprises
下载PDF
导出
摘要 现阶段借助反倾销等手段进行贸易保护在世界范围内比比皆是。但贸易保护措施也会产生一定的成本,对于反倾销的实施成本研究也成为了当下的热点,众多国家在反倾销条例中规定了公共利益条款就是为了减小反倾销实施成本。笔者以相互倾销模型为基础,运用博弈论分析自由贸易、单方反倾销、双方反倾销和合作创新博弈对企业R&D存在溢出效应情况下的影响,并对四种情况下企业的价格、产出和R&D均衡解进行比较,剖析了实施反倾销的理论依据。 Presently resorting to antidumping for trade protection is very prevalent throughout the world. However trade protection measures have their cost and the research of the cost of antidumping has become a hot issue and a lot of countries stipulates the public interest clause in the law of antidumping just to diminish the cost of antidumping implement. The article, based on the model of reciprocal dumping, uses game theory to analyse the influence of free trade, unilateral antidumping protection, bilateral antidumping protection and cooperative innovation game on the spillover effect of enterprises, then compares the corporate solution of price, output and R&D equilibrium in those four situations, and finally analyses the theoretical basis of antidumping practice.
作者 曲如晓 江铨
出处 《经济经纬》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第5期43-47,共5页 Economic Survey
基金 国家社会科学基金项目"WTO框架下的贸易壁垒与我国的应对机制研究"(05BGJ003)的阶段性成果。
关键词 反倾销 贸易保护 R%D策略 合作创新博弈 antidumping trade protection R&D strategy cooperative innovation game
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Spencer and Brander,1983:"International R&D rivalry and industrial strategy"[J].Review of Ecnomic Studies,Vol 50:702-722.
  • 2Bagwell and staiger,1992:"The sensitivity of strategic and corrective R&D policy in battles for monopoly"[J].International Economic Review,Vol 33:795-816.
  • 3Miyagiwa and Ohno,1995:"Closing the Technology Gap Under Protection"[J].The American Economic Review,Vol 85:755-770.
  • 4Miyagiwa and Ohno,1997:"Strategic R&D policy and appropriablity"[J].Journal of International Economics,Vol 42:125-148.
  • 5Gao and Miyagiwa,2005:Antidumping protection and R&D competition[J].Canadian Journal of Economics,Vol 38:211-227.
  • 6Staiger and Wolak,1989:"Strategic Use of Antidumping Law to Enforce Tacit International collusion",NBER Working Paper,No.3016.
  • 7Prusa,1992:"Why are so many antidumping petitions withdrawn?"[J].Journal of International Economics,Vol 33:1 -20.
  • 8Panagariya and Gupta,1998:"Antidumping duty versus price competion"[J].World Economy,Vol 21:1003-1019.
  • 9Veugelers and Vandenbussche,1999:" Eurpean Antiddumping Policy and the Profitability of National and International Collusion"[J].European Economic Review,Vol 47:1-28.
  • 10Gupta,1999:"Why do firms pay antidumping Duty?",IMF Working Paper No.99/166.

二级参考文献12

  • 1吕炳斌.试论反倾销实施中的保护主义倾向及其调整[J].华东理工大学学报(社会科学版),2003,18(2):82-86. 被引量:4
  • 2郑甘澍,邓力平.从反倾销税到反倾销补贴[J].国际贸易问题,2005(5):53-60. 被引量:5
  • 3亚当·斯密著 郭大力译.《国民财富的性质和原因的研究》(下卷)[M].商务印书馆,1997年版.第27页.
  • 4胡家强.《反倾销应诉与诉讼中被忽略的几个问题》[EB/OL].http://www.deheng.com.cn/asp/paper/html/200291613402721 .htm.,.
  • 5雅各布·瓦伊纳著 沈瑶译.《倾销国际贸易中的一个问题》[M].商务印书馆,2003年.第322页.
  • 6.[EB/OL].http://www.chinatradeonline.org/databases/anti-dumping.doc .,.
  • 7.[EB/OL].http://www.meide.org/2001/chinamericatrade/010501 .ht m,http://chemnet.com.cn/newscenter/11/00061316.heml .,.
  • 8.[EB/OL].http://www.texindex.com.cn/Articles/2003-8-4/16038.htm.,.
  • 9.[EB/OL].http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/adp_e/adp_e.htm .,.
  • 10D.Salvatore, International Economics, 5th ed. (Prentice-Hall,lnc,1995) P.265.

共引文献8

同被引文献84

引证文献5

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部