期刊文献+

牙种植区不同曝光强度RVG骨密度测量结果比较 被引量:1

The Influence of different exposure intensity on bone mineral dentisy analiysis of dental implants by radiovisiograph
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨牙种植区不同曝光强度放射直视影像(RVG)骨密度测量结果比较及在牙种植中对颌骨质量的评估。方法76例患者82个拟种植区域,术前分别在三种不同曝光强度下拍摄RVG,观察和测量种植区域骨密度值变化,分析不同曝光强度下以及灰度调节后RVG骨密度值的变化。结果不同曝光强度下三组之间的骨密度测量值均有显著性差异(P<0.05),随着曝光强度的增加,骨密度值随之降低。灰度调节对同一种曝光强度下的RVG图像的骨密度测量值没有影响(P>0.05)。结论利用不同曝光强度下RVG骨密度测量结果的变化对牙种植区骨质量评价具有快速、经济、辐射量小、直观的特点。 [ Objective] To explore influence of different exposure intensities on bone mineral dentisy (BMD) analysis and evaluation of Jaws quality of dental implants with RVG. [ Methods ] 82 implants were planed to be placed in the jaws of 76 cases. The BMD of the jaws was observed and measured by RVG altering the exposure intensities and gray levels before implants placing. The variation of BMD during different groups was detected and analyzed by spssl3.0 software. [ Results] One way ANOVA analysis showed there was a statistical difference among three groups of different exposure intensities( P 〈 0.05 ), and the BMD values were declined with the increasing of the exposure intensifies. There was no statistical difference among the different gray scales in the same group (P 〉 0.05 ). [ Conclusion ] The BMD analysis of RVG by varying exposure intensity is a useful method to analyze the BMD of the jaws before dental implants surgery,for its advantage of economy, quickness, less radiation exposure and direct-viewing.
出处 《山东医药》 CAS 北大核心 2007年第33期11-12,共2页 Shandong Medical Journal
基金 安徽省教育厅资助课题(2004kj242zc)。
关键词 牙种植 放射直视影像 曝光强度 骨密度 dental implants radiovisiograph exposure intensity bone mineral density
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献8

  • 1叶茂昌,周来生,陈柯,胡闻,陈梅梅,李容新,王来平.无机诱导因子复合性支架材料修复骨缺损的组织学观察[J].口腔颌面外科杂志,2005,15(3):247-250. 被引量:10
  • 2[1]Kim BS,Mooney DJ.Development of biocompatible synthetic extracellular matrices or tissue engineering.[J].Trends Biotech.1998,16(5):224-230.
  • 3[2]Zhao M,Xiao G,Berry JE ,et al.Bone morphologic protein 2induces dental follicle cells to differentiate toward a cementoblast/osteoblast phenotype[J].J Bone Miner Res,2002,17(8):1441-1451.
  • 4[3]Lewandrowski KU,Grsser JD,Wise DL,et al.Bioresorbable bone graft substitutes of different osteoconductivities:A histologic evaluation of osteointegration of poly-based cement implants in rats[J]Biomaterials,2000,21 (8):757-764.
  • 5[5]Yang GY,Simmons DJ,Lozano R,et al.The healing of grafts combining freeze-dried and demineralized allogenic bone in rabbits[J].Clin Orthop,1994,298:289-294.
  • 6[6]Yasko AW,Lane JM,Fellinger E J,et al.The healing of segmental bone defects,induced by recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP-2).A radiographic,histological,and biomechanical study in rats[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,1992,74(5):659-670.
  • 7[7]Tiedeman JJ,Lippieello L,Connolly JF,et al.Quantitative rentgenographic densitometry for assessing fracture healing [J].Clin Orthop,1990,253:279-286.
  • 8[8]Bruder SP,Jaiswal N,Haynesworth SE.Growth kinetics,self-renewal,and the osteogenic potential of purified human mesenchymal stem cells during extensive subcultivation and following cryopreservation [J].J Cell Biochem,1997,64(2):278-294.

共引文献9

同被引文献10

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部