期刊文献+

股骨转子间骨折的手术治疗 被引量:1

Operations Respectively of Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨不同内固定方法在股骨转子间骨折治疗中的意义。方法:2000年5月至2006年5月我院采用135°角钢板,动力髋螺钉(DHS),Gamma钉,股骨近端髓内钉(PFN)内固定治疗60例股骨转子间骨折患者。将每组患者术后优良率、并发症及骨折临床愈合时间,术后功能恢复程度等进行比较。结果:所有病例:优38例,良15例,可7例,优良率89%,平均愈合时间16周,无骨折延迟愈合及不愈合。结论:应用Gamma钉及股骨近端髓内钉(PFN)治疗股骨转子间骨折手术创伤小,固定牢固,出血少,能早期活动,治愈率高,并发症少,疗效满意。 Objective:To explore the significance of various kinds of optioual internal fixations of intertrochanteric hipf ractures. Method:From May 2000 to May 2006,60 cases with intertrochanteric hip fractures were followed up. They were treated with the four kinds of operations respectively :angled blade plate( 135o), dynamic hip screw ( DHS ), Gamma nail, proximal femoral nail ( PFN ), The date of each group were collected for statistical anglysis on the following aspects : intraoperative complications, clinical healing time of fracture, postoperative restored function and complications. Result:All cases, excellent results achieved in 38 eases,good in 15,fair in 7,excellent and good rate was 89% ,All the fractures were healed with an average healing time of 16 weeks without delay union and nonunion. Conclusion:Gamma nail and proximal femoral nail(PFN) in treating the intertrochanteric hip fractures have the following advantages, such as less -invasion, stable fixation, fewer blood loss, early - mobilization, high union rate and fewer complication.
出处 《河北医学》 CAS 2007年第11期1315-1316,共2页 Hebei Medicine
关键词 股骨骨折 骨折内固定 Femoral fractures Fracture internal fixation
  • 引文网络
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献12

  • 1Jensen JS, Miehaelsen M. Troehanteric femoral fractures treated with McLaughlin Osteosynthesis. Acta Orthop Stand, 1975, 46: 795-803.
  • 2Parker M J, Palmer CR. A nev, mobility score for predicting mortality after hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 1993, 75: 797-798.
  • 3Kitamura S. Hasegawa Y, Suzuki S. et al. Functional outcome after hip fracture in Japan. Clin Orthop, 1998, (348): 29-36.
  • 4Rogers FB, Shackford SR, Kelleer MS. Early fixation reduces morbidity and mortalilv in elderly patients with hip fractures from low-impact falls. J Trauma, 1995, 39: 261-265.
  • 5Baixauli F, Vicent V, Baixauli E, et al. A reinforced rigid fixation device for unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Clin Orthop. 1999,(361): 205-215.
  • 6Parker MJ. Trochanteric hip fractures: fixation failure commoner with femoral medialization: a comparison of 101 cases. Acta Orthop Seand, 1996, 67: 329-332.
  • 7Simmermacher RK, Rosch AM, Van der Werken C. The AO/ASIF-proximal femoral nail(PFN): a new device for the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fracture. Injury, 1999. 30: 327-332.
  • 8Sadowski C, Lubbeke A, Saudan M, et at. Treatment of reverse oblique and transverse intertrochanteric fractures with use of an intramedullary nail or 95 ° screw-plate. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 2002,84: 372-381.
  • 9Herrra A. Domingo LJ, Catvo A, et at. A comparative study of the trochanteric fractures treated with the Gamma nail or the proximal nail. Int Orthop, 2002, 26: 365-369.
  • 10Buciuto R, Hammer R, RAB-plate versus sliding hip screws for unstable trochanteric hip fractures: stabitity of the fixation amt modes of failure-radiographic analysis of 218 fractures. J Trauma, 2001,50: 545-550.

共引文献388

同被引文献2

引证文献1

;
使用帮助 返回顶部