期刊文献+

保证H.264视频通信质量的实时传输协议载荷 被引量:5

Real-Time Transport Protocol Payload for Guaranteeing the QoS of H.264 Video Delivery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在详细研究H.264标准的网络适配层(NAL)和实时传输协议(RTP)的基础上,提出一种可以保证H.264视频通信质量的实时传输协议(ERRTP)载荷结构,载荷结构中使用了NAL头字段和前向纠删(FEC)保护字段,在增加开销很小的情况下,支持对H.264视频码流进行FEC不等保护,同时可以保证时延在实时视频通信允许的范围内.性能分析和实验结果表明,与RTP协议相比,使用ERRTP载荷的传输效率基本没有变化,且ERRTP支持FEC不等保护,与单一FEC保护相比,在高丢包率下恢复视频质量的峰值信噪比可以提高2-9 dB,满足分组丢失环境下实时视频通信的服务质量要求. On the basis of detailedly researching on real-time transport protocol (RTP) and network adaptation layer (NAL) of video coding standard H. 264, a payload format of real-time transport protocol for guaranteeing QoS of H. 264 video delivery over IP network is proposed, in which the NAL header and the forward erasure correction (FEC) field is employed. With less extra overhead, the proposed payload can support FEC unequal-protection for H. 264 video stream and ensures the delay to be in allowable range for real-time video delivery. Performances analysis and experimental results show that compared with RTP, the transmission efficiency using ER- RTP is basically not changing and ERRTP supports FEC unequal-protection,and compared with single FEC protection, the PSNR of recovery video quality can be increased by 2-9 dB, which satisfies QoS demands of real-time video communication under packet drop environment.
出处 《西安交通大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第12期1455-1459,共5页 Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University
基金 陕西省自然科学基础研究计划资助项目(2004F07) 综合业务网理论与关键技术国家重点实验室资助项目
关键词 H.264标准 实时传输协议 服务质量 前向纠删 H. 264 standard real-time transport protocol quality of service forward erasure correction
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Telecommunication Standardization Sector. ITU-T recommendation H. 264 Advanced video coding for generic audiovisual services[S]. Geneva, Switzerland: Tele- commumication Standardization Sector, 2003.
  • 2Wenger S. H. 264/AVC over IP [J]. IEEE Trans on Circuits and Systems for Video Tech, 2003, 13(7): 645-656.
  • 3Mohamed S, Rubino G. A study of real-time packet video quality using random neural networks [J]. IEEE Trans on Circuits and Systems for Video Tech, 2002, 12(12) : 1071-1083.
  • 4Schulzrinne H, Casner S, Frederick R, et al. RFC 3550 RTP: a transport protocol for real-time applications [S/OL]. (2003-07-01)[-2007-02-08]. http:// www. ietf. org/rfc/frc3550, txt.
  • 5Ott J, Bormann C, Sullivan G, et al. RFCA629 RTP payload format for ITU-T Rec H. 263 video [S/OL]. (2007-01-05) [2007-02-08]. http://www. ietf. org/rfc/ rfc4629, txt.
  • 6Kikuchi Y, Nomura T, Fukunaga S, et al. RFC3016 RTP payload format for MPEG-4 audio/visual streams [S/OL]. ( 2000-11-01 ) [2007-02-08]. http://www. ietf. org/rfc/rfc3016. txt.
  • 7Wenger S, Hannuksela M M, Stockhammer T, et al. RFC 3984. RTP payload format for H. 264 video[S/ OL]. (2005-02-01)[2007-02-09]. http://www. ietf. org/rfc/rfc3984.txt.
  • 8Luby M, Mitzertrnacher M, Shokrollahi A, et al. Practical loss-resilient codes [C]// Proc of the 29th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing. New York:ACM Press, 1997:150-159.
  • 9周宁兆,宋彬,常义林.基于H.264/AVC的视频通信抗分组丢失方法研究[J].计算机学报,2006,29(2):267-273. 被引量:8

二级参考文献6

  • 1Wiegand Thomas,Sullivan G.J.,Bjontegaard Gisle et al..Overview of the H.264/AVC video coding standard.IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology,2003,13(7):560~576.
  • 2ITU Telecom.Standardization Sector of ITU.Advanced video coding for generic audiovisual services.ITU-T Recommendation H.264,May,2003.
  • 3Luby M.,Mitzenmacher M.,Shokrollahi M.A.,Spielman D.,Stemann V..Practical loss-resilient codes.In:Proceedings of the 29th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing,El Paso,Texas,United States,1997,150~169.
  • 4Byers J.,Luby M.,Mitzenmacher M.,Rege Ashutosh.A digital fountain approach to reliable distribution of bulk data.In:Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM'98,Vancouver,British Columbia,Canada,1998,56~67.
  • 5宋彬,常义林.基于主观质量控制的数字视频综合抗误码技术[J].电子学报,2001,29(7):919-922. 被引量:9
  • 6宋彬,常义林.基于H.26L的视频抗误码方法研究[J].西安电子科技大学学报,2003,30(4):450-454. 被引量:7

共引文献7

同被引文献51

引证文献5

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部