期刊文献+

花园路径现象认知分析 被引量:3

A Cognitive Analysis of Garden Path Phenomena
下载PDF
导出
摘要 "花园路径"是一个较为复杂的现象。国内外学者从许多角度对这一现象的成因作了不同的讨论。文章通过一个新角度——认知语言学里的原型范畴理论和竞争模型理论就花园路径现象的成因作了一次尝试性的分析与解读,认为:读者依据原型范畴理论和线索竞争模型理论所阐述的思路,去解读一个非原型的词项语义或非原型的句法结构或存在歧义的句子,是导致花园路径现象的根本原因。 Garden Path Phenomena are very complicated for which many scholars at home and abroad have explored the reasons from various perspectives. This paper provides a tentative explanation of how Garden Path Phenomena come into being from another new point of view, i.e. the Prototype Categorization Theory and the Cue Competition Theory and draws a conclusion that the essential reason why the Garden Path Phenomena come into being is that a reader conducts an analysis of the meaning of a word and syntactic structure of a sentence which are of non - prototype or a sentence which has different meanings following the line of thought elaborated in the Prototype Categorization Theory and the Cue Competition Theory.
作者 王云 郭智颖
出处 《四川教育学院学报》 2007年第11期66-70,共5页 Journal of Sichuan College of Education
关键词 花园路径现象 原型范畴理论 线索竞争模型理论 Garden Path Phenomena the Prototype Categorization Theory the Cue Competition Theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献34

  • 1Bates, E. A. & B. M aeWhinney. 1989. Functionalism and the competition model [A]. In B. MaeWhinney& E. Bates (eds.). The Cross linguistic Study of Sentence Processing [C]. New York: CUP.
  • 2Bever, T. G. 1970. The cognitive basis for linguistic structures [A]. In J. R. Hayes. Cognition and Development of Language [ C ]. New York, Wiley.
  • 3Fordor, J.A. ( 1971 ). Recognition of syntactic structure. In D. L. Horton & J. J. Jenkins (Eds.), The perception of language . Columbus, Ohio; Charles E.Merrill
  • 4Frazier. L. & C. Clifton. 1996. Construal [M]. Cambridge, MA. : M IT Press.
  • 5Frazier. L. & C. Clifton. 1997. Construal: Overview, motivation, and some new evidence [J]. Journal of Psyeholinguistie Research 26/3 : 278 - 294.
  • 6Frazier, L. & J. Ford. 1978. The sausage machine, a new two-stage parsing model [J]. Cognition, (6) : 291 - 325
  • 7Frazier, L. & K. Rayner. 1982. Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension; Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive psychology, 14
  • 8Kimball. J, 1973. Seven principles of surface structure parsing in natural Language [J]. Cognition, 2
  • 9Kimball, J. (ed.). Syntax and Semantics. Volume 4 [C]. New York: Academic Press, 1975
  • 10Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things : What Categories Reaveal about the Mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

二级参考文献46

  • 1徐章宏.“花园路径现象”的认知语用学解释[J].广东外语外贸大学学报,2004,15(3):16-19. 被引量:33
  • 2李力.图式结构在英语阅读中的作用[J].西南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1994,26(4):86-90. 被引量:7
  • 3蒋祖康.“花园路径现象”研究综述[J].外语教学与研究,2000,32(4):246-252. 被引量:72
  • 4刘国辉,石锡书.花园幽径句的特殊思维激活图式浅析[J].外语学刊,2005(5):5-11. 被引量:28
  • 5高觉敷.西方心理学的新发展[M].人民教育出版社,1987.419.
  • 6Bever, T.G. The cognitive basis for linguistic structures [A]. In J. R. Hayes, Cognition and Development of Language [C]. New York: Wiley, 1970.
  • 7Blakemore, D. Semantic Constraints on Relevance[M]. Oxford: Blackwell, 1987.
  • 8Carrell, P. L. & J.C. Eisternhold. Schema Theory and ESL Reading pedagogy[A]. In Carrell, P. L., Devine, J. and Eskey, D.E. (eds.) Interactive Approaches to Second Language Reading[C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
  • 9Christianson, et al., Thematic Roles Assigned along the Garden Path Linger[J]. Cognitive Psychology, 2001(42): 368-407.
  • 10Duranti, A. Linguistic Anthropology[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.

共引文献122

同被引文献7

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部