摘要
情境语义学解悖方案是近年西方悖论研究的重要典范,在诸多解悖方案中独树一帜。本文通过对情境语义学解悖方案与传统解悖方案的比较研究,指出二者在解悖思路、对说谎者悖论产生根源问题的认识、解悖方案的实质、解悖结果等方面均存在重大差异。
As an important mode in the research of paradox in recent years of the West,the solution of situation semantics to the strengthened liar paradox develops a school of its own.Based on a comparative research of the solution of situation semantics and traditional solutions,the paper argues that they are rather different at four points: cognition of the cause of the liar paradox,solutions to the liar paradox,essences of the solutions,and results of the solutions.
出处
《自然辩证法通讯》
CSSCI
北大核心
2007年第6期42-46,59,共6页
Journal of Dialectics of Nature
基金
中国政法大学人文社会科学研究项目(020397)"当代西方悖论研究的发展趋势"
国家社会科学基金项目(06BZX051)"自然语言逻辑研究系列"阶段性成果