摘要
建于1953年的原同济大学建筑系大楼——文远楼一直被誉为"我国最早的也是惟一的典型的包豪斯风格建筑",然而,重新审视其建造背景及处理手法,不难发现其与格罗皮乌斯的设计及教学理念相去甚远。本文便从现代主义时期、现代主义教学、设计者背景、现代主义在设计中的体现四方面对文远楼的"包豪斯风格"进行重新阅读,发现其定论有失偏颇而须进一步探讨!
Wenyuan House which was constructed in 1953 originally used as the teaching house of the college of architecture has been regarded as the earliest style of Bauhaus in China.However,after rereading its constructing background and architectural methods,it isn't difficult to find that its Bauhaus style is far from the teaching idea of Gropius.ln this paper,I will reanalyze the Bauhaus style of Wenyuan House in four aspects:the different periods of modernism in China and in German;the different teaching method of modernism in Tongji and in Bauhaus;the different knowledge background of modernism of the designer;the embodying of modernism in design.Then come to a conclusion that:the Bauhaus appraisal of Wenyuan House is not proper and need further discussion!
出处
《建筑师》
2007年第5期91-95,共5页
The Architect