期刊文献+

台湾医疗健保制度之公平性:一个初步分析 被引量:3

Evaluation of the Fairness of Taiwan Health Care Insurance:A Preliminary Analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用丹尼尔斯的健康照护改革之十个基本的公平性标记,进行伦理分析,以展示台湾全民健保的公平性的标准,作为进一步改革的基础。整体来说,台湾的健保制度到现为止,在公平性的表现上可说是差强人意的。最大的缺失是财务的有效管理上,这不但是最重要的产生不公平的来源之一,也是健保制度能否保持下去的主要关键所在。 Ten.benchmarks for the evaluation of a just reformation of health care system are employed for the ethical analysis of the justice of Taiwan health care insurance system. In sum, the performance of the system is satisfactory in terms of justice. The most important defect is the inefficient management of the financial budget. This is not only the source of injustice, but also the key whether the Taiwan health insurance could be upheld for the future.
作者 李瑞全
出处 《医学与哲学(A)》 北大核心 2007年第12期28-31,共4页 Medicine & Philosophy:Humanistic & Social Medicine Edition
关键词 公平性 全民健保 公平性标记 fairness, population health care insurance, benchmark of fairness
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Norman Daniels. Justice and Justification: Reflective Equilibrium[ M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
  • 2Norman Daniels, Bruce Kennedy, Ichiro Kawachi. Is Inequality Bad for our Health? [M]. Boston: Beacon Press, 2000.
  • 3Allen Buchanan, Dan W. Brock, Norman Daniels,et al. From Chance to Choice: Genetics and Justice[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
  • 4Norman Daniels, Donald W. Light,Ronald L. Caplan. Benchmarks of Fairness for Health Care Reform [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
  • 5Norman Daniels. Is There a Right to Health Care and, If so, What does it Encompass? [ A/M ]. Helga Kuhse, Peter Singer ( ed. ) A Companion to Bioethies . Oxford: Blaekwell Publishers, 1998:316 - 325.
  • 6陈樱琴,黄于玉,颜忠汉.医疗法律[M].3版.台北:五南图书出版公司,1995:335-339.
  • 7蓝忠孚,熊惠英.台湾全民健康保险之变革与展望[EB/OL].[2007-08-30].http://www.ccswf.org.tw/2005paper/healthy/lan.doc.
  • 8H. Tristram Englehardt. “Rights to Health Care, Social Justice, and Fairness in Health care Allocations: Frustrations in the Face of Finitude [A/M]. Tom L. Beauchamp, LeRoy Walters(ed. ) Contemporary Issues in Bioethics. Belmont: Wadworth- Thomson Learning, 2003:64

同被引文献80

引证文献3

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部