期刊文献+

应用简化细胞分析软件进行角膜内皮细胞图像定量分析的可靠性研究 被引量:1

Assessment of the reliability of haman corneal endothelial morphologic parameters estimated using center by center method analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨应用简化细胞分析软件分析角膜内皮细胞图像时,抽样细胞数量对分析结果可靠性的影响。设计临床试验研究。研究对象同一志愿者右眼的中央角膜内皮细胞图像30张。方法用非接触角膜内皮镜拍摄清晰的内皮细胞图像。应用细胞中心分析法对内皮细胞图像进行定量分析,每次分析时抽取不同数量的细胞,从10个细胞至90个细胞,每一图像分析9次。比较不同抽样细胞数量所得各组分析结果间的差异。主要指标角膜内皮细胞密度、细胞密度的变异系数。结果各组内皮细胞密度的变异系数随着点数细胞数量的增加,呈现逐渐下降并趋于稳定的趋势,点数细胞数10、20、30、40、50至90的细胞密度变异系数分别为9.5、6.3、4.6、4.4、4.3至3.8。点数10个和20个细胞的两组内皮细胞密度与其他各组比较均有显著性差异(P<0.05);点数30至90个细胞的各组间比较均无显著性差异。结论应用细胞中心分析法对角膜内皮细胞图像进行定量分析时,点数细胞数量应大于等于30个。(眼科,2007,16:421-424) Objective To evaluate the effect on reliability with different sample amount when human corneal endothelial morphologic parameters estimated using center by center method analysis. Design Clinical study. Participants Thirty central corneal endothelium photo-micrographs for the same eye.Methods Noncontact specular photomicrographs were obtained.Each photo-micrograph was analyzed with center by center method and was analyzed for 9 times by pointing different amount cells,from 10 to 90.Compare the diversity of comeal endothelial morphometric parameters between different groups.Main Outcome Measures Corneal endothclium density,coefficient of veriation.Results The coefficient of variation decreased and then kept to a same level when sample cell amount were added from 10 to 90. With the sample cell amounts varied from 10,20,30,40,50 to 90,the coefficient of variation was changed from 9.5,6.3,4.6,4.4,4.3 to 3.8.Corneal endothelium density had significant difference between the first two groups of 10 and 20 cell with the othe groups (P〈0.05).There was no significant difference among the seven groups of 30 to 90 cells.Conclusion Using center by center method analysis need point out at leas 30 cells which could obtain reliable endothelial morphologic parameters.(Ophthalmol CHN, 2007, 16: 421-424)
作者 刘瑄 朱萍
出处 《眼科》 CAS 2007年第6期421-424,共4页 Ophthalmology in China
关键词 角膜内皮镜 角膜内皮细胞 形态学定量分析 specular microscopy corneal endothelium quantitative morphometric analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Cheung SW, Cho P. Endothelial cells analysis with the TOPCON specular microscope SP-2000P and 1MAGEnet system. Curt Eye Res, 2000, 21: 788-798.
  • 2Bourne WM, Kaufman HE. Specular microscopy of human corneal en- dothelium in vivo. Am J Ophthalmol,1976, 81: 319-323.
  • 3Laing R, Chiba K, Tsubota K, et al. Metabolic and morphologic changes in the corneal endothelium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 1992, 33: 3315-3324.
  • 4Laing RA. Specular microscopy of the cornea. Curr Top Eye Res, 1980, 3: 157-218.
  • 5Michael JD, Andreas M, Mohammed LZ. Assessment of the reliability of human corneal endothelial cell-density estimates using a noncontact specular microscope. Cornea, 2000, 19: 148-158.
  • 6Willem S, Bart TH. Validity of endothelial cell analysis methods and recommendations for calibration in Topcon SP-2000P specular microscopy. Cornea, 2005, 24: 538-544.
  • 7Bursell SE, Huhgren BH, Laing RA. Evaluation of the corneal en-dothelial mosaic using an analysis of nearest neighbor distances. Exp Eye Res, 1981, 32: 31-38.

同被引文献11

  • 1Goldich Y, Marcovich AL, Barkana Y, et al. Comparison ofcomeal endothelial cell density estimated with 2 noncontact specularmicroscopes. European Journal of Ophthalmology, 2010, 20:825-830.
  • 2Almubrad TM. Comparison of the precision of the Topcon SP-3000Pspecular microscope and an ultrasound pachymeter. ClinicalOphthalmology, 2011,5: 871-876.
  • 3Dou^ityMJ,Muller A, ZamanML Assessment of the reliability ofhuman comeal endothelial cell-density estimates using a noncontactspecular microscope. Cornea,2000,19 : 148-158.
  • 4Binder PS, Akers P, Zavala EY. Endothelial cell densitydetermined by specular microscopy and scanning electronmicroscopy. Ojithalmolty, 1979 , 86: 1831-1847.
  • 5Doughty MJ,Fonn D, Nguyen KT. Assessment of the reliability ofcalculations of the coefficient of variation for normal andpolymegethous human comeal endothelium. Optometry & VisionScience, 1993,70: 759-770.
  • 6McCareyBE, Edelhauser HF, Lynn MJ. Review of comealendothelial specular microscopy for FDA clinical trials of refractiveprocedures, surgical devices, and new intraocular drugs andsolutions.Cornea, 2008, 27: 1-16.
  • 7Hirst LW, Yamauchi K, Enger C, etal. Quantitative analysis ofwide-field specular nucroscopy. II. Precision of sampling from thecentral comeal endothelium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 1989,30: 1972-1979.
  • 8Lass JH, Gal RL, Ruedy KJ, et al. An evaluation of imagequality and accuracy of eye bank measurement of donor corneaendothelial cell density in the Specular Microscopy Anciliaiy Study.Ophthalmology, 2005, 112: 431-440.
  • 9潘晓平,倪宗瓒.组内相关系数在信度评价中的应用[J].华西医科大学学报,1999,30(1):62-63. 被引量:106
  • 10成拾明,黄锦海,李岩,杨欣,高蓉蓉,王勤美.不同非接触式角膜内皮镜测量角膜内皮细胞密度临床结果的比较[J].中华实验眼科杂志,2012,30(2):150-154. 被引量:4

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部