期刊文献+

一种基于模糊约束的多并发双边自动协商模型 被引量:4

Fuzzy constraint-based model for multiple concurrent bi-lateral negotiations
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了获取所需的资源或服务,消费者可以同时与多个资源或服务的提供者进行双边协商,从中选择最令自己满意的交易,针对此类应用背景提出了一个基于模糊约束的多并发双边协商模型。在此模型中,消费者的需求和偏好被表示为模糊约束,可采用三种基于带优先级的模糊约束满足问题(PFCSP)的协商策略评估协商对手的提议并做出提议和反提议,同时设计了不同的协调策略来协调多个并发的协商线程。最后通过实验验证了协商的有效性,并分析比较了各种不同的协商策略和协调策略。 To obtain a particular resource or service, consumer may engage in multiple concurrent bi-lateral negotiations with several providers for a most satisfied deal. A fuzzy constraint-based model was developed for this multiple concurrent negotiations. In this model, the consumers' requirements and preferences were expressed by fuzzy constraints, and they could adopt three negotiation strategies based on the idea of PFCSP ( Prioritized Fuzzy Constraints Satisfaction Problem) to evaluate the proposals from their opponents or made counter-proposals themselves. In addition, different coordination strategies were designed to coordinate multiple bi-lateral negotiation threads. At last, the validity of the model was experimentally verified and varieties of negotiation strategies and coordination strategies were compared.
出处 《计算机应用》 CSCD 北大核心 2007年第12期2906-2909,2912,共5页 journal of Computer Applications
基金 西南大学青年基金资助项目(SWUQ2006011)
关键词 协商 AGENT 模糊约束 协商策略 协调策略 negotiation Agent fuzzy constraint negotiation strategy coordination strategy
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1JENNINGS N R, FARATIN P, LOMUSCIO A R, et al. Automated negotiation: prospects, methods and challenges [J]. Journal of Group Decision and Negotiation, 2001, 10(2) : 199 -215.
  • 2FOSTER I, JENNINGS N R, KESSELMAN C. Brain meets brawn:why grid and agents need each other [C] // Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. New York: IEEE Press, 2004: 8-15.
  • 3GUTTMAN R, MAES P. Cooperative vs. competitive multi-agent negotiations in retail electronic commerce [C]//Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Cooperative Information Agents Ⅱ, Learning, Mobility and Electronic Commerce for Information Discovery on the Internet, LNCS 1435. London: Spfinger-Verlag, 1998: 135-147.
  • 4NARAYANAN V, JENNINGS N R. Learning to negotiate optimally in non-stationary environments [C]// Proceedings of 10th International Workshop on Cooperative Information Agents, LNCS 4149. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2006:288-300.
  • 5FARATIN P . Automated service negotiation between autonomous computational agents [D]. London: University of London, Department of Electronic Engineer Queen Mary and Westfield College, 2000.
  • 6LUO X, JENNINGS N R, SHADBOLT N, et al. A fuzzy constraint based model for bilateral multi-issue negotiations in semi-competitlve environments [J]. Artificial Intelligence Journal, 2003, 148(1/2) : 53 -/02.
  • 7杨佩,高阳,陈兆乾.一种劝说式多Agent多议题协商方法[J].计算机研究与发展,2006,43(7):1149-1154. 被引量:21
  • 8COHEN P. Empirical methods for artificial intelligence [M]. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1995.

二级参考文献14

  • 1S. S. Fatima, M. Wooldridge, N. R. Jennings. An agendabased framework for multi-issue negotiation [J]. Artificial Intelligence, 2004, 152(1) : 1-45
  • 2J. V. Neumann, O. Morgenstem. The Theory of Games and Economic Behavior [M]. New York: Princeton University Press,1994
  • 3P. Huang, K. P. Sycara. Computational model for online agent negotiation [C]. In: Proc. HICSS 2002. Los Alamitos, CA:IEEE Computer Society Press, 2002. 28
  • 4S. Kraus, K. P. Sycara, A. Evenchik. Reaching agreements through argumentation: A logic model and implementation [J].Artificial Intelligence, 1998, 104(2): 1-69
  • 5S. Kraus. Automated negotiation and decision making in multiagent environments [C]. In: Proc. EASSS 2001. Berlin:Springer, 2001. 150-172
  • 6S. Parsons, S. C. Caries, N. R. Jennings. Agents that reason and negotiate by arguing [J ]. Journal of Logic and Computation,1998, 8(4): 261-292
  • 7S. S. Fatima, M. Wooldridge, N. R. Jennings. Optimal agendas for multi-issue negotiation [C]. In: Proc. AAMAS 2003. New York: ACM Press, 2003. 129-136
  • 8R. Y. K. Lau, S. Y. Chan. Toward belief revision logic based adaptive and persuasive negotiation agents [C]. In: Proc.PRICAI 2004. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2004. 605-614
  • 9M. Barbuceanu, W. K. Lo. Multi-attribute utility theoretic negotiation for electronic commerce [C]. In: Proc. AMEC 2000.Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2001. 15-30
  • 10C. E. Alchourrdn, P. Gardenfors, D. Makinson. On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions [J].Symbolic Logic, 1985, 50(2): 510-530

共引文献20

同被引文献53

引证文献4

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部