期刊文献+

从中美IP/WTO第一诉谈我国的轻罪体系建构——重在两国IP保护力度的分析 被引量:11

On the Construction of China's Petty Crimes System
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文从中美IP/WTO第一诉论及两国IP保护尤其是刑法保护力度问题。作者在全面分析了争诉原因和两国立法与司法机制差异的前提下,基于对两国IP保护强度综合评价指标的测算,认为两国IP保护力度大体相当,或许在个别方面(如刑罚力度)美国稍强于中国;美国侧重于司法保护,而中国则是民事、行政和刑事一体保护;中国的行政罚相当于美国的轻罪罚。从国家长远利益和社会稳定考虑,本文主张应尽快建立中国的轻罪体系,通过对立法与司法机制的局部调整,较合理地解决长久以来中国制裁体系不合理的状况。 Intrigued by the first lawsuit of IP/WTO, this text focus on the strength problem of criminal protection in IP industry between China and the US. Author given a comprehensive analysis on the cause of lawsuit and the differences between the two countries' s judicial mechanisms, and firmly based on the evaluate and mensuration of integration about the strength protection in IP industry between the two countries, and think that the strength of protection are roughly equal, however, few aspects of it (e.g. punishment strength) might show more stronger in the US than in China. The US take a emphasis on the judicial protection, whereas China takes a full protection ranging from administratve law to criminal law and civil law. Chinese administrative ptmishrnent is considered as punishment for misdemeanor in the US. Even though this fact is so, having taken account of the state's long- term interests, social stableness and international environment, Author still suggeste that China constitute a misdemeanor system by reasonably resolving the unreasonable situations of Chinese long - time existed punishment system through partly adjusting the mechanism of legislation and justice.
作者 李晓明
出处 《中国法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第6期166-188,共23页 China Legal Science
  • 相关文献

参考文献59

  • 1Trade and Tariff Act of 1984,Bar182 and The Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988, Bar 1301 - 1310.
  • 2WTO Case Challenging Weaknesses in Chlan's Legal Regime for protection and Enforcement of Copyrights and trademarks. Office of the United States Trade Representative, Apr.09,2007, http://www. ustr. gov.
  • 3《中美知识产权WTO第一诉发布》,http://www.marketbook.net/xwzz/200836225.html,2007年6月6日.
  • 4刘力.《中美之间的贸易摩擦》.《学习时报》,2007年3月26日.
  • 5The United States Trade Representative's Office issued a report entitled of Feb. 14, 2006: “U.S. - China Trade Relations : greater access to the lawenforcement responsibilities and the new stag” and“United States 06 record high trade deficit”, Wall Street Daily, 02/14/2007.
  • 6廖湘琨.《中美面临的“知识产权”战争》,载香港《文汇报》2005年8月5日.
  • 7杨起全,吕力之.《美国知识产权战略研究及对中国的启示》,http://www.21oc.com/news/html.
  • 8Doug Palmer: U. S., in policy shift, sets new duties on China goods, Reuters,03/30/2007.
  • 9Tariff Act of 1897, Bar5 and Amendment of United States Trade Rights Enforcement Act of Jun.27,2005.
  • 10《美国首次针对中国盗版问题向WTO提起诉讼》,http://tech.163.com.

二级参考文献21

共引文献165

同被引文献277

引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部