期刊文献+

国外通用量表比较分析 被引量:3

A Comparative Analysis about the Foreign Generic Instruments
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:为我国健康相关生命质量的研究提供参考。方法:比较分析常用的健康相关生命质量通用量表。结果:SF-36健康调查是健康相关生命质量结果测量中最常用量表;NHP反映的是业外人士对健康的认知情况;SIP衡量的是疾病对行为的影响;QWB、HUI和EQ-5D都是基于偏好的测量。结论:目前并无统一的量表,要根据测量目的、人口特征和使用环境等选择量表。 Objective: To provide information for the health related quality of life research in China. Method: Make a comparative analysis about the generic instruments of health related quality of life. Result: The SF-36 health survey is the most commonly used HRQoL measure. The NHP was developed to reflect lay perceptions of health. The SIP was constructed as a measure of sickness in relation to impact on behavior. The QWB scale, HUI and EQ-SD are preference-based measures. Conclusion: At present, there are no uniformly instruments, so we should base our instrument selection on the purpose of the measurement, the characteristics of the population and the application environment and so on.
作者 李轩 孙利华
出处 《药物流行病学杂志》 CAS 2007年第6期373-375,共3页 Chinese Journal of Pharmacoepidemiology
关键词 健康相关生命质量 通用量表 分析 Health related quality of life Generic instruments Analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Glennie JL. Health-related quality of life and regulatory issues in the US and Canada[ J]. PharmacoEconomics, 2003, 21(6) : 372.
  • 2Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DL. Measuring health-related quality of life [ J]. Annals of Internal Medicine, 1993, 118(8) : 626.
  • 3Coons SJ, Rao S, Keininger DL, et al. A comparative review of generic quality-of-life instruments [ J ]. PharmacoEconomic, 2000, 17( 1 ) : 13-35.
  • 4Nemeth G. Health related quality of life outcome instruments [J]. European Spine Journal, 2006, 15(1s) : 44-51.
  • 5汪培山,周登远,贾真琳,李丽剑,田疆.临床试验文献质量评价量表的制作和评价[J].药物流行病学杂志,2007,16(1):46-50. 被引量:5

二级参考文献7

  • 1周登远,汪培山.临床对照试验文献质量评价的发展与现状[J].药物流行病学杂志,2004,13(4):211-214. 被引量:10
  • 2Kaldenberg DO,Koening HF,Becker BW.Mail survey response rate patterns in a population of the elderly[J].Public Opinion Quarterly,1994,58:68-76
  • 3Sackett DL,Straus SE,Richardson WS,et al.Evidence-Based Medicine:How to practice and Teach EBM[M].2nd edition.London:Churchill Livingstone,2000
  • 4Begg Colin,Cho M,Eastwood S,et al.Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials:the CONSORT statement[J].JAMA,1996,276:637-639
  • 5Moher D,Schulz KF,Altman DG.The CONSORT statement:revised recommendations for improving the quality of reporting of parralel-group randomized trials[J].Lancet,2001,357:1191-1194
  • 6Jadal AR,Moore RA,Carroll D,et al.Assessing the quality of reporters of randomized clinical trials:is blinding necessary?[J] Controlled Clinical Trials,1996,17:1-12
  • 7Pill J.Delphi method:substance,context,a critique and an annotated bibliography[J].Socio-Economic Science,1991,5:57-71

共引文献4

同被引文献28

引证文献3

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部