期刊文献+

爱丁堡学派的歧途:从“强纲领”到社会学有限主义

The Crossroad of Edinburgh School:From Strong Program to Socio-logical Finitism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 爱丁堡学派是SSK的第一个学派,爱丁堡学派理论发展的脉络十分清晰,前期的论说核心是"强纲领",后期是"社会学有限主义",爱丁堡学派从强纲领到社会学有限主义的理论延伸,并没有使爱丁堡学派摆脱相对主义困境,反而加剧了这一困境,并最终导致爱丁堡学派的衰落。 For Edinburgh School, the relativism is the most important point of view both in its Strong Program and sociological finitism. The paper argues that the failure to settle the problem of relativism leads to the declination of the school, while its emphasis of theory has changed from the Strong Program to the sociological finitism.
作者 袁海军 郭敏
出处 《内蒙古大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第6期54-57,共4页 Journal of Inner Mongolia University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
关键词 爱丁堡学派 强纲领 社会学有限主义 相对主义 edinburgh school the Strong Program sociological finitism relativism
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Barnes, B. and David Bloor. 1982. Relativism, rationalism and the sociology of knowledge. In Rationality and Relativity[ M ]. edited by Martin Hollis and Steven Lukes. Oxford: Basil BlackweU Publisher Limited.
  • 2Fuller, Steve. 1994. Can Science Studies be Spoken in a Civil Tongue [ J ]. Social Studies of Science, Vol. 24.
  • 3Kuhn, Thomas S. 1992. The Trouble with the Historical Philosophy of Science[ M ]. Cambridge: Department of the History of Science, Harvard University.
  • 4Shapin, Steven and Simon Sehaffer. 1985. Leviathan and the Air - pump- Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life [ M ]. Princeton, N. J. : Princeton University Press.
  • 5Bloor, David. 1991/1976. Knowledge and Social Imagery [ M ]. Chicago : The University of Chicago Press.
  • 6Latour, Bruno. 1999. For David Bloor … and Beyond: A Reply to David Bloor's Anti - Latour[J]. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, Vol. 30 ( 1 ).
  • 7大卫·布鲁尔 艾彦译.知识和社会意象[M].北京:东方出版社,2001..
  • 8Barnes, B. , David Bloor and John Henry. 1995. Scientific Knowledge: A Sociological Analysis [ M ]. London : Athlone Press.

共引文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部