期刊文献+

两种库存管理方法下的牛鞭效应比较分析 被引量:1

A Comparative Study of Bullwhip Effect between Two Different Inventory Management Approaches Based on ARIMA Demand
原文传递
导出
摘要 建立了ARIMA供应链需求模型,利用订货量方差和需求方差的比值,分别对Order-up库存管理方法和基于MRP的库存管理方法下的牛鞭效应进行了量化。比值大于1则牛鞭效应存在且与比值成正比,反之则牛鞭效应不存在。模拟试验对两种库存管理方法作了对比,结果表明基于MRP的库存管理方法在多数情况下产生了较小的牛鞭效应。 In this paper, the ARIMA demand model is established in a supply chain. And we use the ratios of the order and demand variances to quantify the bullwhip effects under Order-up inventory management approach and MRP based inventory management approach separately. If the ratio is greater than 1, the bullwhip effect exists and is proportional to the ratio; if not, the bullwhip effect does not exit. Simulation model is used to compare these two approaches and the results show that MRP based approach gives smaller bullwhip effect than the traditional order-up approach in most cases.
出处 《工业工程与管理》 2007年第6期7-12,共6页 Industrial Engineering and Management
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70471042)
关键词 供应链 库存管理方法 牛鞭效应 模拟 ARIMA supply chain inventory management approach bullwhip effect simulation ARIMA
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

二级参考文献77

  • 1Box,G.E.P G.M.Jenkins 等.时间序列分析:预测与控制[M].中国统计出版社,1997..
  • 2季建华(译).供应链设计与管理[M].上海:远东出版社,2000..
  • 3[1]Anand, K., & Mendelson, H., Information and Organization for Horizontal Multimarket Coordination [ J ]. Management Science,1997,43(12): 1609 ~ 1627.
  • 4[2]Lee, H. L., Padmanabhan, V., & Whang, S., The Bullwhip Effect in Supply Chains [ J ]. Sloan Management Review, 1997, (3): 93 ~ 102.
  • 5[3]Lee, H. L. , Padmanabhan, V., & Whang, S., Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect [ J ]. Management Science,1997,43(4) :546 ~ 558.
  • 6[4]Sterman, J. D., Modeling Managerial Behavior: Misperceptions of Feedback in a Dynamic Decision Making Experiment [ J ]. Management Science, 1989,35(3) :321 ~ 329.
  • 7[5]Towill, D. R., Industrial Dynamics Modelling of Supply Chains [ J ]. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 1996,26(2): 23 ~ 42.
  • 8Sterman J D. Modeling managerial behavior: Misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment [J]. Management Science, 1989, 35:321--339.
  • 9Sterman J D. The beer distribution game[A]. In Heieke J, Meile L, eds. Games and Exercises for Operations Management [M].New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1995. 101--112.
  • 10Senge P M, Sterman J D. System thinking and organizational learning: Acting locally and thinking globally in the organization of the future [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1992, 59(3): 137--145.

共引文献263

同被引文献3

引证文献1

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部