期刊文献+

古代梓、楸考异 被引量:9

Distinguishing Catalpa ovata and Catalpa bungei in Ancient China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 梓和楸的关系问题历史上曾有不同的看法,一种观点认为古代二者指同一种树,另一种观点则认为是不同的树。文章通过考察古代典籍发现,在得名上梓源于"子",楸得名于"秋",古人以是否有子来区分梓和楸;在栽培方法上梓树采用播种育苗,楸树采用插根育苗;在用途上两树虽有某些相同之处,但区别也很明显;在文化意蕴上二者各有特色。由此文章认为古代梓树和楸树是两种不同的树。 There have been different opinions about the relationship between Catalpa ovata and Catalpa bungei in the history of Chinese language. Someone believed that they belong to the same species of tree, while others hold different opinion. This paper finds out that there are four completely different aspects between this two species of tree by studying Chinese ancient books. The first is that C. ovata named from Zi(子) but C. bungei from autumn. The second is that C. ovata's seedlings were raised by sowing and C. bungei by baring root transplanting of large trees. Third, there are different applications and different culture implications between these two species of tree. Studies show that they should be different species in ancient China.
作者 李朝虹
出处 《北京林业大学学报(社会科学版)》 2007年第4期20-24,共5页 Journal of Beijing Forestry University :Social Sciences
关键词 梓树 楸树 考辨 Catalpa ovata Catalpa bungei distinguish
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1郑樵.通志[M].北京:中华书局,1987..
  • 2李时珍.本草纲目[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1975.2426.
  • 3[8]丁度.宋刻集韵[M].北京:中华书局,2005.
  • 4[11]马承源.上海博物馆藏战国楚竹书(4)[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2004:178.
  • 5[13]徐坚.初学记[M].北京:中华书局,2004:327.
  • 6[14]张舜徽.说文解字约注(中册)[M].郑州:中州书画社,1983:12
  • 7王利器.盐铁论校注[M].北京:中华书局,1992.353,390.
  • 8詹锳.文心雕龙义证[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1989..
  • 9[29]吴普.神农本草经[M].沈阳:辽宁科学技术出版社,1997:44.
  • 10[31]徐震(王咢).世说新语校笺(下)[M].北京:中华书局,1984:396.

共引文献179

同被引文献81

引证文献9

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部