期刊文献+

作为过错侵权责任构成要件的非法性与过错——我国过错侵权责任制度应当采取的规则 被引量:8

The Illegality and Fault of the Components of the Liability for Fault Tort——Rules that Liability System of Fault Tort Should Adopt in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 非法性同过错的区分原则仅仅是少数国家的法律所规定的现象,大多数国家的侵权法认为过错同非法行为是内涵和外延等同的概念;过错实际上是一种注意义务的违反行为,是一种非法行为;将非法行为看作过错之外的独立构成要件既违反了我国《民法通则》的明确规定,也违反了民法所贯彻的法典内在平衡的公共政策,还违反了当代侵权法的发展潮流;废除主观过错理论,确立客观过错理论是我国未来侵权法应当坚持的重要原则。 The distinguishing principle between illegality and fault is only a law phenomenon in minority countries; fault and unlawful acts are the same concepts of intension and extension in majority countries; in fact fault is the breach of that duty, which is an unlawful act, thus it violates not only the general principles of civil law but also internal trimmed public policy of the civil law and even the development of the tort law in the modern society. Therefore it is an important principle for the tort law to abolish the subjective fault theory and establish objective fault theory.
作者 张民安
机构地区 中山大学法学院
出处 《甘肃政法学院学报》 CSSCI 2007年第4期1-17,共17页 Journal of Gansu Political Science and Law Institute
关键词 非法性 主观过错 客观过错 责任构成要件 illegality subjective fault objective fault the components of the liability
  • 相关文献

参考文献42

  • 1H. Kotz G. Wagner, Deliktsrecht, 9th edo, 2001, no. 109.
  • 2Vlrich Magnus and Gerhard Seher,Fault under German Law, p. Widmer ed, Unification of Tort Law: Fault, Kluwer Law, p105.
  • 3E. Deutsch, Unerlaubte Handlungen, Schadensersatz und Schmerzensgeld, 3rd , ed , 1995, no. 121. See p. Widmer, p106.
  • 4BGH in (1986) NJW,2757,2758.
  • 5Jean Carbonnier, Droit civil, 41Les Obligations, press Universifaires De France, pp404-419.
  • 6Herman A. Cousy, Wrongfulness In Belgian Tort Law, H. Koziol, Unification of Tort Law,. Wrongfulness, KLUWER LAW, p31.
  • 7Herman Cousy and Dimitri Droshout, Fault under Belgian Law, P. Widmer ed, Unification of Tort Law, Kluwer Law International , p32.
  • 8V. L. Cornelis, Principes du droit belge de responsabilite extra-contractuelle,L'acte illic4te(1990), Maklu-Bruylanr, pp779.
  • 9H. L. et J. Mazeaud, Traite theorique et pratiqne de la responsabilite civil et delictuelle et contractuelle: H. L. Mazeaud et A. Tune, Traite preeite, t. 1, 6e ed, n05 426 ets.
  • 10Henry Roland et Laurent Boyer, Responsabilite delictuelle, 3e edition, litec,p37.

共引文献77

引证文献8

二级引证文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部