期刊文献+

社区系统管理对高血压患者生命质量影响 被引量:7

Effect of Community Systemic Management on Quality of Life in Patients with Hypertension
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析评价社区系统管理对高血压患者生命质量的影响。方法运用横断面调查研究方法以统一印制的调查表对社区系统管理的224例高血压患者和205例在市级医院就诊、从未接受社区管理的高血压患者进行问卷调查。调查内容包括社会人口学特征、生活行为、高血压病程、治疗情况等,采用中文版SF-36量表测定生命质量、症状痛苦调查表测定症状。以t检验、χ2检验和协方差分析等方法进行统计分析。结果管理组患者的高血压防治知识平均得分为(6.40±1.31)分,未管理组平均得分为(5.02±1.82)分,管理组高于未管理组(t=8.82,P<0.01);管理组患者血压有效控制率为49.6%,高于未管理组(27.3%),差别有统计学意义(χ2=22.26,P<0.01);管理组患者的平均症状数为(6.99±4.85)个,由症状引起的痛苦值为(25.99±26.67)分,未管理组平均症状数为(9.21±6.15)个,由症状引起的痛苦值为(33.20±34.15)分,差别均有统计学意义(分别为t=4.14,P<0.01和t=2.45,P<0.05);SF-36量表生命质量总分值及生理职能、社会功能、情感职能、精神健康等维度值高于未管理组(P<0.01)。结论社区系统管理可提高高血压患者的生命质量。 Objective To evaluate the effect of community systemic management on quality of life in patients with hypertension. Methods A cross-sectional study was used to survey 224 patients with essential hypertension systemically managed in community and 205 non-management patients using the questionnaire including demographic information, hehaviour, years of hypertension, treatment, Chinese version SF-36 short form of quality of life and the symptom distress checklist. Student-t test, X2-test, and covariance analysis was used in data analysis. Result The managed patients' mean score of knowledge (6.40±1.3 1) was significantly higher than that in non-managed patients" (5.02±1.82, t=8.82, P〈0.01). The control rate of hloed pressure in patients received systemic management were significantly higher than that in non-management patients (49.6% & 27.3%, χ^2=22.26,P〈0.01). The symptoms count and score of overall symptom distress in managed patients were 6.99±4.85 and 25.99±26.67, which significantly lower than those (9.21±6.15 and 33.20±34.15 respectively) in non-managed ones (t=4.14, P〈0.01 and t=2.45, P〈0.05). The results of patients' quality of life hy SF-36 scale showed the total score, role-physical, social functioning, role-emotional, mental health domains were higher in managed patients than in non-management ones (P〈0.01). Conclusions Community systemic management can remarkably improve hypertension patients' quality of life.
出处 《中国慢性病预防与控制》 CAS 2007年第6期536-538,共3页 Chinese Journal of Prevention and Control of Chronic Diseases
基金 无锡市科技发展项目资助(CS055024)
关键词 高血压 生命质量 系统管理 Hypertension Quality of life Systemic management
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1李鲁,王红妹,沈毅.SF-36健康调查量表中文版的研制及其性能测试[J].中华预防医学杂志,2002,36(2):109-113. 被引量:2107
  • 2Anderson RB, Nackley JF, Testa MA. Symptom distress check lists as a component of quality of life measurement, comparing symptom reports with responses to multiple choice questionnaires[J]. Drug Information J, 1995, 29: 1689-1707.
  • 3王红妹,李鲁,沈毅.中文版SF-36量表用于杭州市区居民生命质量研究[J].中华预防医学杂志,2001,35(6):428-430. 被引量:304
  • 4Mena MFJ, Martin EJC, Simal BF, et al. Health-related quality of life of subjects with known and unknown hypertension: results from the polrelation-based hortega study[J]. J Hypertens, 2003, 21: 1235-1236.
  • 5Klocek M, Kawecka JK. Quality of life in patients with essential arterial hypertension. Part Ⅰ: The effect of socio-demographic factors[J].Przegl Lek, 2003, 60: 92-100.
  • 6Klocek M, Kawecka JK. Quality of life in patients with essential arterial hypertension. Part Ⅱ: The effect of clinical factors[J]. Przegl Lek, 2003, 60: 101-106.
  • 7Steven RE, Pharm D, Brent CW, et al. Relationship between symptoms and health-related quality of life in patients treated for hypertension[J]. Pharmacotherapy, 2004, 24: 344-350.
  • 8Ezzati M, Lopez AD, Rodgers A, et al. Elected major risk factors and global and regional burden of disease[J]. Lancet, 2002, 360:1347-1360.
  • 9李立明.流行病学[M]第4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2000.44-49
  • 10顾东风,Jiang He,吴锡桂,Kristi Reynolds,甘文奇,刘东海,宿少勇,段秀芳,黄广勇,Paul K.Whelton.中国成年人高血压患病率、知晓率、治疗和控制状况[J].中华预防医学杂志,2003,37(2):84-89. 被引量:553

二级参考文献32

  • 1全国血压抽样调查协作组.中国人群高血压患病率及其变化趋势[J].高血压杂志,1995,3(A01):7-13. 被引量:508
  • 2于守洋 陈炳卿.社会营养.营养与食品卫生学,第3版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1995.100-101.
  • 3Ware JE Jr, Snow KK, Kosinski M, et al.SF-36 health survey manual and interpretation guide.Boston: New England Medical Center the Health Institute,1993.1-12.
  • 4Perneger TV, Leplege A, Etter JF,et al.Validation of a French-language version of the MOS 36-Item Short Form Health Survey(SF-36) in young healthy adults.J Clin Epidemiol, 1995,48:1051-1060.
  • 5Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D.Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines.J Clin Epidemiol, 1993,46:1417-1432.
  • 6Gandek B, Ware JE Jr.Methods for validating and norming translations of health status questionnaires: the IQOLA Project approach.International Quality of Life Assessment.J Clin Epidemiol, 1998,51:953-959.
  • 7顾杏元,金丕焕.直线回归与相关.见: 金丕焕,主编.医用统计方法.上海:上海医科大学出版社,1993.115-119.
  • 8Lam CL, Gandek B, Ren XS, et al.Tests of scaling assumptions and construct validity of the Chinese(HK) version of the SF-36 Health Survey.J Clin Epidemiol, 1998,51:1139-1147.
  • 9Ren XS, Amick B 3rd, Zhou L, et al.Translation and psychometric evaluation of a Chinese version of the SF-36 Health Survey in the United States.J Clin Epidemiol, 1998,51:1129-1138.
  • 10Till JE, Osoba D, Pater JL, et al.Research on health-related quality of life: dissemination into practical applications.Qual Life Res, 1994,3:279-283.

共引文献2924

同被引文献90

引证文献7

二级引证文献58

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部