期刊文献+

企业集团引发的反垄断难题 被引量:7

The Difficult Antitrust Problems Arisen from Business Group
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文从企业集团的界定、性质和域外管辖权三个角度提出了其所引发的反垄断难题。本文的主要观点是企业集团作为一种企业间组织,兼有"企业性"与"市场性"二重属性;企业集团的"二重性"是导致企业集团垄断行为隐蔽性和复杂性的根本原因;处理企业集团的反垄断问题需要准确判断企业集团行为属性。本文通过案例研究,分析了美国和欧盟处理企业集团反垄断难题时的一些典型做法;提出了处理企业集团反垄断难题的基本原则。 The difficult antitrust problems from the definition, nature, and the extraterritoriality of business group are proposed in this paper. The main point of views include the business group is an inter-firm organization form; it has dual natures, which are firm nature and market nature. The dual natures result in the concealed and complex activities. It needs judge the nature of business group's activities exactly dealing with the antitrust problems, some typical practices of antitrust cases in American and EU are analysis, and some fundamental principles to deal with the difficult antitrust problems of business group are argued.
作者 于左
出处 《中国工业经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第12期53-60,共8页 China Industrial Economics
基金 国家社会科学基金项目"企业集团引发的产业组织问题与规制"(批准号03CJY002) 教育部基地重大项目"中国反垄断法与反不正当竞争法的共同经济原理及其衔接"(批准号04JJD790007) "竞争政策的国际协调:机理 机构与法律"(批准号05JJD790030)
关键词 企业集团 企业集团“二重性” 反垄断难题 business group the dual natures of business group the difficult antitrust problems
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Masahim Shimotani. The History and Structure of Business Groups in Japan [A]. Takao Shiba and Masahiro Shimotani. Book Beyond the Finn: Business Group in International and Historical Perspective [C]. Oxford University Press, 1997.
  • 2L. Keister. Chinese Business Groups: The Structure and Impact of Interfirm Relations during the Economic Development[M]. Oxford University Press,2000.
  • 3Phillip I. Blumberg. Problems of Parent and Subsidiary Corporations under Statutory Law of General Application [M]. Little, Brown and Company, 1989.
  • 4于立,于左,陈艳利.企业集团的性质、边界与规制难题[J].产业经济评论(山东),2002(2):49-62. 被引量:15
  • 5于立,吴绪亮.国际竞争政策的分歧、互动与展望[J].世界经济研究,2006(9):4-10. 被引量:10
  • 6吴越.企业集团法理研究[M].北京:法律出版社,2004.

二级参考文献19

  • 1于立,孟韬.企业联盟和虚拟企业的理论解释与现实意义[J].社会科学辑刊,2001(5):67-72. 被引量:22
  • 2Brittan, L. and van Miert, K. (1996), "Towards an International Framework of Competition Rules", International Business Lawyer 24, pp. 454-457.
  • 3Clarke, J. L and Evenett, S. J. (2003), "A Muhilatcral Framework for Competition Policy?", in: State Secretariat of Economic Affairs and S. J. Evenett (eds.), The Singapore Issues and the World Trading System: The Road to Cancun and Beyond, Berne, pp. 77-168.
  • 4Drexl, J. (2003), "Do We Need "Courage" for International Antitrust Law. , in: J. Drexl (ed.), The Future of Transnational Antitrust-From Comparative to Common Competition Law, Bern: Staempfli & Kluwer, pp.311-341.
  • 5First, H. (2003), "Evolving Toward What? - The Development of International Antitrust", in: J. Drexl (ed.),The Future of Transnational Antitrust - From Comparative to Common Competition Law, Bern: Staempfli & Kluwer, pp. 23-51.
  • 6Hoekman, B., P. Holmes (1999), "Competition Policy,Developing Countries and the WTO". Policy Research Working Paper, No.2211, World Bank.
  • 7Scherer, F. M.,(1994), "Competition Policies for an Integrated World Economy". Washington, DC: the Block-ings Institution.
  • 8Experiences gained so far on international cooperation on competition policy issues and the mechanisms used. td/rbp/conf.5/4.
  • 9Leon Brittan, A Framework for International Competition,Address delivered at World Competition Forum, Switzerland (Feb.3, 1992).
  • 10Communication from the European Community and its Member States, WT/WGTCP/W/222, 19 November 2002.

共引文献24

同被引文献133

引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部