期刊文献+

中欧监督制度的若干比较和借鉴

A Comparative Study on Supervision Institution Between China and European Countries
下载PDF
导出
摘要 运用功能比较的方法,以我国和欧盟及其成员国的有关监督制度为比较对象,说明二者在历史背景、制度保障、选任资格和功能作用上具有共同的起点,分属以内部监督为主和以外部监督为主的模式。同时,借鉴欧盟监察专员的成功经验,对比我国现行的监督制度和《监督法》,提出一些建议,以期完善我国的监督制度。 It makes a comparison on supervision institution between China and European Union, by using functional comparison in order to illustrate the same beginning point of historical background, institutional guarantee, qualification of election and its function between China and European Union. Both of them can be defined as interior supervision and exterior supervision respectively. At the same time, a comparative study will be made on institution and supervision in China by drawing on the experience of European Union so as to present some suggestions and improve the supervision institution of our country.
作者 朱力宇 袁钢
出处 《北京联合大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 2007年第4期76-80,共5页 Journal of Beijing Union University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
关键词 监察/监督 议会监督 行政监察 欧盟 功能比较 supervise monitor parliamentary supervisory system administrative supervisory system EuropeanUnion comparative study
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1张广立.《中国监察制度史》绪论[J].当代继续教育,1998,28(5):34-36. 被引量:1
  • 2[7]本特·维斯兰德尔.瑞典的议会监察专员[M].程洁译.北京:清华大学出版社,2001.
  • 3[3]Markku Suksi,Case C-234/02,P,European Ombudsman V.Frank Lamberts,Common Market Law Review,42,2005,p.1765.
  • 4[3]http:.//www.dulmime.org/dictionary/diction.hun的Ombudsman的词条.
  • 5[4]参见http://www.ombudsassociation.org/
  • 6[1]OJ L54,25 February 1994,p.25
  • 7[3]http://www.euro-Ombudsman.eu.int/home/en/legal.htm.
  • 8[2]Article 6.2,Statute of the European Ombudsman.
  • 9[3]Rule 194,Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament.
  • 10[4]Simone Cadeddeu,"The Proceedings of the European Ombudsman",Law and Contemporary Problems,Vol.68,Winter 2004,P.161.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部