期刊文献+

论外交保护制度中的公司国籍规则——2004年联合国国际法委员会《外交保护条款草案》述评 被引量:3

On the Rules on the Nationality of Corporations of the Diplomatic Protection System——Comments on ILC Draft Articles on Diplomatic Protection 2004
下载PDF
导出
摘要 外交保护的对象包括一国的公司,有权行使外交保护的国家原则上是公司的国籍国。外交保护制度适用特定的公司国籍规则。公司国籍适用双重标准:成立地和注册办事处、管理层总部所在地等,而不适用"真正联系"标准。在公司不存在或公司具有造成损害的被指称责任国的国籍的情形下,股东的国籍国可以行使外交保护权。 The objects of diplomatic protection include corporations of a state. The state which has rights of diplomatic protection is generally the state of nationality of corporations. The diplomatic protection system includes special rules on nationality of corporations. The nationality of corporations applies dual criteria: the formed location and the location of registered office or the seat of management, etc. , while the "genuine link" test can not be applied. Where a corporation had ceased to exist or it had the nationality of the state responsible for causing injury to the corporation, the state of nationality of the shareholders of corporation is entitled to exercise diplomatic protection.
作者 黄涧秋
出处 《甘肃政法学院学报》 CSSCI 2007年第6期85-89,共5页 Journal of Gansu Political Science and Law Institute
基金 江苏省教育厅2006年哲学社会科学基金项目<我国海外公民权益的外交保护>(批准号:06SJD820001)的阶段性研究成果
关键词 外交保护 公司 国籍 股东 diplomatic protection corporations nationality shareholders
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1王慧.对跨国公司外交保护问题的分析[J].中外法学,1997,9(6):70-75. 被引量:5
  • 2Craig Forcese, Shelter from the Storm: Rethinking Diplomatic Protection of Dual Nationals in Modern International Law [J]. George Washington International Law Review, Vol. 37, 2005, p. 480.
  • 3朱炎生.ICSID仲裁机制中法人国籍认定的理论与实践[A].国际经济法学刊(第13卷第1期)[C].北京:北京大学出版社,2006:248.
  • 4[英]詹宁斯 瓦茨修订 王铁崖译.奥本海国际法(第一卷第一分册)[M].北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1995.319.
  • 5Linda A. Mabry, Multinational Corporations and U. S. Technology Policy: Rethinking the Concept of Corporate Nationality[J], Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 87. 1999, p. 584.
  • 6孙效敏.我国判断外国投资者国籍刍议[J].政法论丛,2005(4):55-59. 被引量:5
  • 7Lawrence Jahoon Lee, Barcelona Traction in the 21st Century: Revisiting its Customary and Policy Underpinnings 35 Years Later[J]. Stanford Journal of International Law, Vol. 42, 2006, p.246.
  • 8Michael J. Matheson. Current Development: The Fifty- sixth Session of the International Law Commission[J].American Journal of International Law. Vol. 99. 2005, pp. 215-216.
  • 9Michael J. Matheson & Sara Bickler, Current Development: The Fifty-fifth Session of the International Law Commission [J]. American Journal of International Law, Vol. 98, 2004, p. 318.

共引文献18

同被引文献39

  • 1孟国碧.论习惯国际经济法[J].河北法学,1999,17(4):81-84. 被引量:3
  • 2刘笋.浅析BIT作用的有限性及对BIT促成习惯国际法规则论的反对论[J].法制与社会发展,2001,7(5):56-64. 被引量:9
  • 3陈杰.公司国籍判断标准之评析——兼论我国公司国籍判断标准的完善[J].天府新论,2006(6):86-88. 被引量:3
  • 4Anthony D'Amato, The Concept of Custom in International Law 104 ( 1971 ), p. 105.
  • 5UNCTAD, International Investment Rule- Making: Stocktaking, Challenges and the Way Forward, United Nations, 2008, p. 23.
  • 6Jeswald W. Salaeuse & Niehloas P Sullivan, Do BITs Really Work : An Evaluation of Bilateral Investment Treaties and Their Grand Bargain, 46 Harv. Intl L. J. 67 (2005).
  • 7Christopher M. Ryan, Meeting Expectations : Assessing the Long - Term Legitimacy and Stability of International Investment Law, 29 U. Pa. J. Intl L. 725 (2008).
  • 8UNCTAD,Investor - State Dispute Settlement and Impact on Investment Rulemaking, UNCTAD/ITE/IIA/2007/3, 2007, 3.
  • 9外国投资法杂志(英文版),1992,:366-367.
  • 10曾华群.《国际投资条约中的征收及其补偿标准》,载陈安主编.《国际投资法的新发展与中国双边投资条约的新实践》,复旦大学出版社2007年版,第95页.

引证文献3

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部