期刊文献+

美国“自然的权利”诉讼 被引量:1

On the Litigation of the Rights of the Nature in the U.S.
下载PDF
导出
摘要 动物等自然物是否有资格提起诉讼,其诉讼行为能否通过人类代为行使是自然的权利诉讼所面临的问题。自然的权利诉讼理论根基可以追溯到环境伦理学中的各种学说,最早的自然的权利诉讼出现在美国,但是,至今美国法院对自然的权利诉讼所表现出的态度却有所差别。 In litigation of the rights of the nature, the problems that we must deal with are whether the things in the nature are proper plaintiffs, and whether human being can stand for them to start actions. The theoretical foundation of the litigation of the rights of the nature can date back to all kinds of theories of environmental ethics. The earliest litigation of the rights of the nature appeared in America, but till now there are still some differences in attitude for American courts on the litigation of the rights of the nature.
出处 《甘肃政法学院学报》 CSSCI 2007年第6期95-101,共7页 Journal of Gansu Political Science and Law Institute
关键词 自然的权利 自然的权利诉讼 环境伦理 原告适格 the right of nature the litigation of the rights of the nature environmental ethics proper plaintiff
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1A·利奥波得.沙乡的沉思[M].候文蕙译.北京:经济科学出版社,1992:201-205.221-223.
  • 2[美]Rodcrick.F.Nash.自然的权利-环境理论文明史(日文版)[M].松野弘译.TBS布里塔尼卡股份公司.1993:4.
  • 3周训方.环境权论[M].北京:法律出版社,2003:103-104.
  • 4[日]谷晋.对美国自然的权利诉讼的考察-从美国standing法理看自然物的原告适格.大学院研究年报,1999,(28):40-40.
  • 5[美]Edith Brown Weiss.International Environmental Law and Policy(影印本)[M].北京:中信出版社.2003:83-84.
  • 6Palila v. Hawaii Dep't of Natural Resources, 852 F. 2d 1106, 1107 (9th Cir. 1988).
  • 7Marbled Murrelet v. Paeifie Lumber Co. , 880 F. Supp. 1343-1346 (N. D. Cal. 1995).
  • 8Loggerhead v. Turtle v. Volusia County Council, 896 F. Supp. 1170-1176. (M.D. Fla 1995).
  • 9Hawaiian Crow v. Lujan, 906 F. Supp. 549, 552 (D,Haw. 1991).
  • 10Citizens To End Animal Suffering and Exploitation, Inc. v, New England Aquarium, 836 F. Supp. 45, 48-49. (D. Mass. 1993).

同被引文献5

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部