期刊文献+

知识权力与科学方法——兼论培根的科学哲学思想 被引量:2

Knowledge Power and Science Method
下载PDF
导出
摘要 培根的科学史地位与他的哲学史地位相比实存着显著方差,其“知识权力说”的断制和经验归纳科学方法的确切寓义与价值所指亦未被学界清晰细化过。我们的努力在于以培根所处时代的“文化生态”为衬托,通过对《工具论》等相关文本的深度解读,从知识与权力归于“一”、知识权力的历史依据、“德性力量”以及知识类别与权力效能等视角描画出“知识权力说”的思想原像,并就其“经验原则”与科学方法之真髓进行了新的提炼。 There is a notable gap between Bacon's status in science history and that in philosophy history. The conclusions drawn in his knowledge power theory, the exact meanings and values of his empirical science method have never enjoyed elaboration of the academic field. This essay aims to dig out the inverse image of "knowledge power theory" against the background of the "cultural ecology" in which Bacon lived, by unscrambling the correlative texts sification of knowledge and the functions of power. It also refines, in a fresh way, the essentialities of his "demonstration principles" and his science method.
作者 炎冰
出处 《扬州大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 北大核心 2007年第2期96-101,共6页 Journal of Yangzhou University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 培根 知识权力 经验原则 科学方法 Bacon knowledge power demonstration principles science method
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1贝尔纳.科学的社会功能[M].北京:商务印书馆,1982.25.
  • 2余丽嫦.培根及其哲学[M].北京:人民出版社,1987.100-101.
  • 3培根.新工具[M].北京:商务印书馆,1984..
  • 4[4]F Bacon.The Advancement of Learning[M].London:Edited by G.Kitchin,1934.
  • 5[5]培根.培根论人生[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1982:13-14.

共引文献80

同被引文献26

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部