期刊文献+

29名台风伤害住院患者定性研究 被引量:2

Qualitative Survey of 29 Inpatients with Typhoon-related Injuries
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的了解台风伤害特征,为开展台风伤害预防控制提供依据。方法对29名台风伤害住院患者进行半结构式个人深入访谈。结果台风伤害住院患者平均年龄53岁,60岁及以上者占44.83%;获得台风信息的主要途径为电视和入户通知;台风伤害的主要类型为硬物压伤和钝器伤、切割伤和跌伤;最常见的伤害部位为四肢,最常见伤害为骨折。直接伤害患者中80.0%未转移或临时转移。结论台风伤害有其特定类型,并存在一定的特征和规律。应根据其特点采取有针对性预防控制措施,减少由台风所致伤害的发生。 Objective To explore the characteristics of typhoon-related injuries and to provide evidence for typhoon-related injury interventions. Methods 29 inpatients with typhoon-related injuries were selected to have a semi-structured in-depth interviews. Results The median age of participants with typhoon-related injuries was 53 years and 44.83% of the inpatients were 60 yeats and older. The main approaches to obtain the information of typhoon were watching television and in-home informing. The main mechanisms of typhoon-related injuries were hit/snick/crush, cutting and falls. The most injured body region was extremity, and the most common injury was fracture. 80% of the direct-injured inpatients were not transferred or were injured during temporary transfer. Conclusion Typhoon-related injury has its specific characteristics and mechanisms, which should be based on when we carried out the interventions.
出处 《中国预防医学杂志》 CAS 2007年第6期678-680,共3页 Chinese Preventive Medicine
关键词 伤害 台风 定性研究 Injury Typhoon Qualitative survey
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Zong Y, Chert X. Typhoon hazards in the Shanghai area. Disasters, 1999, 23: 66-80.
  • 2Beale B, Cole R, Hillege S, et al. Impact of in-depth interviews on the interviewer: roller coaster ride. Nurs Health Sci, 2004, 6: 141- 147.
  • 3Jani AA, Fierro M, Kiser S, et al. Hurricane Isabel-related mortalityvirginia, 2003. J Public Health Manage Pract, 2006, 12: 97-102.
  • 4Gagnon EB, Aboutanos MB, Malhotra AK, et al. In the wake of Hurricane Isabel: a prospective study of postevent trauma and injury control strategies. Am Surg, 2005, 71: 194-197.
  • 5Millie M, Senkowski C, Stuart L, et al. Tornado disaster in rural Georgia: triage response, injury patterns, lessons learned.Am Surg, 2000, 66: 223-228.
  • 6May AK, McGwin G Jr, Lancaster LJ, et al. The April 8 1998 turnado: assessment of the trauma system response and the resulting injuries.J Trauma Injury Infect Critical Care, 2000, 48: 666-672.
  • 7Lai TI, Shih FY, Chiang WC, et al. Strategies of disaster response in the health care system for tropical cyclones: experience following Typhoon Nari in Taipei City. Acad Emerg Med, 2003, 10: 1109-1112.
  • 8龚震宇,柴程良,屠春雨,林君芬,邱银伟,高奕,曾光,RE.Fontaine,CK.Lee,陈坤.“云娜”台风对人群伤害现状的流行病学研究[J].中华医学杂志,2005,85(42):3007-3009. 被引量:6
  • 9Thomalla F, Schmuck H. "We An Knew that a Cyclone Was Coming" : Disaster Preparedness and the Cyclone of 1999 in Orissa, India. Disasters, 2004, 28: 373-387.

二级参考文献6

共引文献5

同被引文献16

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部