期刊文献+

对罗夏测验中自我知觉记分的效度检验 被引量:1

Validity of self-perception score in Rorschach Rating Scale
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:通过与罗夏评定量表RRS的对比研究,验证罗夏墨迹测验中自我知觉记分的效度。方法:①对象:某大学教育学院2004级心理学专业,学前教育专业,教育学专业的63名本科生。其中男生15名,女生48名;平均年龄21.2岁。受试者对测试知情同意。②测试方法:个别测试罗夏墨迹测验,根据罗夏综合系统的解释统计出H、H%、ECI等9个与自我概念有关的指标,并让熟悉的人根据RRS的内容对63名学生的自我知觉分别做出评定,分自我中心、自信、自我评价客观性3个分量表记分。再计算出罗夏墨迹测验的9项自我知觉记分与RRS的3个评定量表间的相关。结果:63名均进入结果分析。罗夏测验中关于自我知觉的测量指标纯H、H%、解剖学内容Ay+Xy、性内容Sx与自我概念的评定间出现了有意义的相关;指标自我中心指数ECI、形状距离反应FD、阴影距离反应sumV、病理内容MOR与自我概念的评定间则没有出现相关,均值差异检验结果亦不显著。结论:罗夏墨迹技术中的指标纯H、H%、An+Xy、Sx适合测量正常人的自我概念,在临床诊断中有重要价值,指标ECI、FD、sumV、MOR则需要进一步研究。 AIM: To investigate the validity of the Rorschach Ink-Blot Method (RIM) in measuring the self-perception and compare with Rorschach Rating Scale (RRS). METHODS: (1)63 college students majored psychology, preschool education or education of Grade 2004 were recruited in this study, including 15 males and 48 females, with a mean age of 21.2 years. Informed consents were obtained from all the subjects. (2)Nine items related to self-concept in Rorschach Comprehensive system were used as criteria, and were aggregated into 3 subscales, namely self-esteem, ego-centricity and accuracy in self-perception. All the 63 students took part in the RIM, and their self-perceptions were peer-rated according to the RRS. Nine indices related to self-perception according to RIM were correlated with 3 RRS subscales. RESULTS: All the 63 subjects were involved in the result analysis. RIM variable H, H%, An+Xy and Sx were correlated significantly with self-concept 3 RRS scales, while ego-centricity index, form dimension, shading dimension and morbid content showed no relationships with RRS. CONCLUSION: RIM variables such as H, H%, An+Xy, and Sx are suitable to measure self-concept of normal subjects, and can be used as important cues in clinical diagnosis, while the validity of ego-centricity index, form dimension, shading dimension and morbid content need further investigations.
出处 《中国组织工程研究与临床康复》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第48期9768-9770,共3页 Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research
基金 辽宁省科技厅资助项目(20061051)~~
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Exner JE. The Rorschach: A comprehensive system: Vol. 2. Interpretation (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley. 1993:50-100.
  • 2Dean KL, Viglione DJ , Perry W, et al. A method to optimize the response range while maintaining Rorschach Comprehensive System Validity. J Pers Assess 2007;89(2):149-161.
  • 3Rose T, Kaser-Boyd N,Maloney MP, Essential of the Rorschach Assessment. Join Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2001:141.
  • 4Quirk MP, Erdberg P, Crosier M, et al.Personality assessment in today's health care environment: therapeutic alliance and patient satisfaction.J Pers Assess 2007;89(2):95-104.
  • 5Mihura JL, Meyer G J, Bel-Bahar T, et al. Correspondence among observer ratings of Rorschach, Big Five Model, and DSM-Ⅳ personality disorder constructs.J Pers Assess 2003;81(1):20-39.
  • 6Meyer G J, Archer RP. The hard science of Rorschach research:What do we know and where do we go? Psychol Assess 2001;13(4): 486-502.
  • 7Meyer GJ. Construct validation of scales derived from the Rorschach method: a review of issues and introduction to the Rorschach rating scale.J Pets Assess 1996;67(3):598-628.
  • 8Meyer G J, Bates M, Gacono C. The Rorschach Rating Scale: item adequacy, scale development, and relations with the big five model of personality.J Pets Assess 1999,73(2):199-244.
  • 9Bornstein RF. Might the RorSchach be a projective test after all? Social projection of an undesired trait alters Rorschach Oral Dependency scores.J Pers Assess 2007;88(3):354-367.
  • 10Gronnerod C. Rorschach assessment of changes following psychotherapy:. a meta-analytic review. J Pers Assess 2004;83(3): 256-276.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部