摘要
目的:评价文拉法辛缓释剂治疗纤维肌痛综合征的疗效和安全性。方法:采用病例对照研究,测查一般资料、心理症状自评量表(SCL-90)、健康状况调查问卷(SF-36)、视觉疼痛模拟量表(VAS)、5点口述疼痛评分问卷(VRS-5)和不良反应评定量表(TESS)。对74例纤维肌痛综合征病人进行12 wk治疗研究,按自愿原则分为2组:研究组38例,给予文拉法辛缓释剂联合常规治疗[即服用镇痛药(非甾体类抗炎镇痛药)];对照组36例,只给予常规治疗。结果:治疗wk 12,研究组VAS疼痛分(26±s 21)、VRS-5疼痛分(1.7±1.5),与对照组比较有非常显著差异(P<0.01);研究组SCL-90中躯体化、抑郁、敌对、恐怖与对照组比较有显著差异(P<0.05);SF-36问卷中生理机能、躯体疼痛、精力活力、一般健康状况、社会功能、情感职能和精神健康7个领域,研究组与对照组比较有显著差异(P<0.05或P<0.01)。研究组不良反应程度较轻微。结论:文拉法辛缓释剂是治疗纤维肌痛安全、有效的药物。
AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of venlafaxine extended release (XR) in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome. METHODS: Seventy-four outpatients and inpatients with fibromyalgia syndrome were voluntarily assigned to two groups: the study group (treated with venlafaxine, n= 38) and the control group (only treated as routine, n= 36). The effects and adverse reactions assessed by symptom checklist 90 (SCL-90), short form 36 health survey questionnaire (SF-36), the visual analogue scale (VAS), a five-point verbal rating scale (VRS) and treatment emergent side-effect scale (TESS) before treatment and at the end of wk 12 of the study, respectively. RESULTS : At the end of the wk 12, there was significant reduction of VAS and VRS scores in both groups (P 〈 0.01). There were significant differences in the factors of somatization, depression, hostile, horror in SCL-90 between the two groups (P 〈 0.05). There were significantly differences in the factors of physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social function, role emotional and mental health in SF-36 between the two groups (P 〈 0.05 were mild and tolerable. CONCLUSION: Venlafaxine is fibromyalgia syndrome. or P 〈 0.01). The adverse reactions of venlafaxine safe, effective and well-tolerated in patients with
出处
《中国新药与临床杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2007年第12期931-934,共4页
Chinese Journal of New Drugs and Clinical Remedies
关键词
抗抑郁药
文拉法辛
纤维肌痛
antidepressive agents
venlafaxine
fibromyalgia