期刊文献+

国际专利制度理论研究与发展跟踪

国际专利制度理论研究与发展跟踪
下载PDF
导出
摘要 国际专利制度理论研究不断深入发展,对专利基本理论、基本原则的探讨继续深入。美国联邦最高法院弹性判例推动了专利制度创新发展;专利法案改革与专利制度国际合作步伐加快,可专利性主题的扩张引起的学术争论仍在继续。 The research of International patent system on theory and principle is enhanced gradually. The flexible judgments of Supreme Court of the United States lead to the development of patent system successfully. The steps of Patent Reform Act and international cooperation are increased obviously, and the dispute on the patentability among the academia is continuous.
作者 姚维保
出处 《现代情报》 北大核心 2007年第12期2-4,共3页 Journal of Modern Information
基金 武汉大学社科项目"国际知识产权动向跟踪研究"成果之一
关键词 专利制度 理论研究 专利改革 Patent system Theory research Patentability Patent reform
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Bradley C.Wright. Recent Developments in Patent Law. 5 J.MashaU Rev. Intell. Prop.. L. 630 (2006).
  • 2Jess Bravin. As Patents Grow More Contentious. Battleground Shifts to High Court, Wall Street Journal. (Eastern edition). New York, N.Y: Nov 28, 2006.
  • 3Robert M.Hunt. Economics and the Design of Patent Systems.. University of Michigan Law SehoolMichigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review, 457, (2007).
  • 4James F.Mcdonough m. The Myth of the Patent Troll: An Alternative View of the Function of Patent Dealers in an Idea Economy. Emory Public Law Research Paper No.07 - 6 Emory Law and Economics Research Paper No.07- 7 Emory Law Journal, Vol. 55, p. 189, 2006.
  • 5Thomas Vallée. Murat Yyldyzoglu. Social and technological efficiency of patent systems, Journal of Evolutionary Economics. Heidelberg: Apr2006. Vol. 16, Iss. 1-2; p. 189.
  • 6Daniel Robinson. The pros and cons of patents. IT Week. London: Jul 30, 2007. pg. 14.
  • 7Stephen C. Glazier. (1997) “Patent Strategies for Business”. New york: Law & Business Institute.
  • 8Andrew A.Sehwartz. The Patent Office Meets the Poison Pill: Why I.egal Methods Cannot Be Patented. Spring, 2007. 20 Harv.J.law &Tec 333.
  • 9Jack Cathey, Howard Godfrey, Justin Ransome. Tax Patents Considered. Journal of Accountancy. New York: Jul 2007. Vol. 204, Iss. 1; pg. 40, 5 pgs.
  • 10Karen. Simon. The Patent Reform Act's Proposed First- To - File Standard: Needed Reform or Constitutional Blunder?, The John Marshall School of Law, The John Marshall Law School Review of Intelhetual Property Law, 129 (2006).

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部