期刊文献+

种植体直径和长度在Ⅰ类骨质中的优化选择 被引量:1

Optimal Selection of Cylinder Implant Diameter and Length in Type Ⅰ Jaw Bone
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:应用Ansys Design Xplorer模块,研究圆柱形种植体直径和长度同时连续变化对Ⅰ类骨质的颌骨应力影响,为临床选择和设计种植体提供理论依据。方法:建立包含圆柱状种植体的下颌骨Ⅰ类骨质骨块的三维有限元模型,设定种植体直径(D)变化范围为3.0—5.0mm,种植体长度(L)变化范围为6.0—16.0mm,观察D和L变化对颌骨Von Mises应力峰值的影响。同时进行颌骨VonMises应力峰值对变量的敏感度分析。结果:随着D和L的增加,垂直向加载时,皮、松质骨的EQV应力峰值分别降低了54.5%和70.2%,颊舌向加载时,皮、松质骨的EQV应力峰值分别降低了73.5%和75,1%;当D大于3,8mm同时L大于9.0mm时,应力峰值的响应曲线的切斜率位于-1和0之间;在垂直向加载和颊舌向加载时,变量D比L更易影响皮质骨的EQV应力峰值。结论:种植体的直径比长度更易影响皮质骨的应力大小。从生物力学角度而言,对于Ⅰ类骨质,在临床上选择种植体时,种植体的直径应不小于3.8mm,种植体的长度应不小于9.0mm。 Objective: To evaluate continuous and simultaneous variations of screwed implant diameter and length in the region of type Ⅰ bone. Methods: We created the mandible segment finite element model of type Ⅰ bone with screwed implant. The range of implant diameter (D) was set from 3.0mm to 5.0mm, and that of implant length (L) from 6.0mm to 16. 0mm. Forces of 200N and 100N were applied along axis of implant (AX) and buccolingual direction (BL), respectively. The maximum equivalent stresses in jaw bone were evaluated, and the sensitivities of stresses to the variables were also evaluated. Results: Under axial load, the maximum Von Mises stresses in cortical and cancellous bones decreased by 54. 5% and 70.2% respectively with increasing D and L. And under buccolingual load, those decreased 73.5% and 75.1% respectively. When D exceeded 3.8mm and L exceeded 9.0mm, the tangent slope rate of the maximum Von Mises stress response curves ranged from - 1 to 0. The variation of the maximum Von Mises stresses in cortical bone was more sensitive to D than to L. Conclusion: Buccolingual force is apt to be influenced by the implant parameters. Implant diameter affects the stress of cortical bone more than length does. Implant diameter exceeds 3.8mm and implant length exceeds 9. 0mm are optimal selection for a screwed implant in the type I bone by biomechanical consideration.
出处 《口腔医学研究》 CAS CSCD 2007年第6期677-680,共4页 Journal of Oral Science Research
关键词 三维有限元分析 Von Mises应力 种植体直径 种植体长度 Ⅰ类骨质 Three -dimensional finite element analysis Stress Implant diameter Implant length Type Ⅰ bone
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Murat C, Joke D, Michel DC, et al. Implant design and interface force transfer a photoelastic and strain -gauge analysis [ J]. Clin Oral Impl Res, 20041 15 (2) : 249 - 257
  • 2Brunski JB. Biomechanical considerations in dental implant design [J]. Int J Oral Implantol, 1988, 5(1):31 -34
  • 3Iplikeioglu H, Akca K. Comparative evaluation of the effect of diameter, length and number of implants supporting three - unit fixed partial prostheses on stress distribution in the bone [ J ]. J Dent, 2002, 30(1):41 -46
  • 4Rho JY, Ashman RB, Turner CH. Young' s modulus of trabecular and cortical bone material: Ultrasonic and microtensile measurements [J]. J Biomech, 1993, 26(2): 111 -119
  • 5Colling EW. The physical metallurgy of titanium alloys [ J ]. Metals Park. American Society for Metals, 1984
  • 6Lewinstein I, Banks- Sills L, Eliasi R. Finite element analysis of a new system (IL) for supporting an implant - retained cantilever prosthesis [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1995, 3 (10) : 355 -366
  • 7Kitamura E, Stegaroiu R, Nomura S, et al. Influence of marginal bone resorption on stress around an implant - a three - dimensional finite element analysis [J]. J Oral Rehab, 2005, 32(4): 279 - 286
  • 8Goodacre CJ, Karl JY, Rungcharassaeng K. Clinical complications of osseointegrated implants [ J]. J Prosthet Dent, 1999, 81 : 537 - 552
  • 9Matsushita Y, Kitoh M, Mizuta K, et al. Two -dimensional FEM analysis of hydroxyapatite implants: diameter effects on stress distribution [ J]. J Oral Implantol, 1990, 16:611 - 621
  • 10Misch CE. Contemporary Implant Dentistry, 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1999

二级参考文献8

  • 1林映荷,胡国瑜,黄琼,楼北雁.用吸光度法对全口义齿咀嚼效能的测定和分析[J].华西口腔医学杂志,1994,12(1):59-62. 被引量:13
  • 2宋兆峻 叶秀分 等.用吸光度法测定咀嚼效能的研究[J].口腔医学,1988,8(2):70-72.
  • 3Chen L, Xie Q, Feng H, et al. The masticatory efficiency of mandibular implantsupported overdentures as compared with toothsupported overdentures and complete dentures [ J ]. J Oral Implantol, 2002, 28 ( 5 ) : 238 - 243
  • 4Tang L, Lund JP, Tache R, et al. A within -subject comparison of mandibular long - bar hybrid implant - supported prostheses : evaluation masticatory function [J]. J Dent Res, 1999, 78(9): 1544 - 1 553
  • 5Pera P, Bassi F, Schiearano G, et al. Implant anchored complete mandibular denture: evaluation of masticatory effiency, oral function and degree of satisfaction [ J ]. J Oral Rehabil, 1998, 25 ( 6 ): 462 - 467
  • 6Tang L, Lund JP, Tache R, et al. A within - subject comparison of mandibular long - bar hybrid implant - supported prostheses:psychometric evaluation and patient preference [ J ]. J Dent Res,1997, 76(10) : 1 675 - 1 683
  • 7Geertman ME, Slagter AP, van Waas MA, et al. Comminution of food with mandibular implant - retained overdentures [ J ]. J Dent Res, 1994, 73 (12):1 858- 1 864
  • 8Budtz - Jorgensen E. Restoration of the partially edentulous mouth- a comparison of overdentures, removable partial dentures, fixed partial dentures and implant treatment [ J ]. J Dent, 1996, 24 (4): 237 - 244

共引文献9

同被引文献6

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部