期刊文献+

中文学术书评中模糊限制语的语用分析 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 该文通过对2005-2006年度发表在CSSCI来源期刊上的30篇中文书评的研究探讨了糊限制语在书评中的类型和功能,将语料中的模糊限制语分为准确性指向、评论者指向、读者指向及原作者指向模糊限制语四类,分析了实现这四类模糊限制语所用的语言方式及其语用功能,得出结论:书评中模限制语的灵活使用可以帮助评论者客观公正的进行评论,同时也可以协调各方面的人际关系。
作者 李红梅
出处 《湖南科技学院学报》 2007年第12期161-163,共3页 Journal of Hunan University of Science and Engineering
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Crompton, Hedging in Academic Writing: Some Theoretical Problems [J]. English for Specific Purposes, 1997, (16)4: 271-287.
  • 2Hyland, K. Writing Without Conviction? Hedging in Science Research Articles [J]. Applied Linguistics, 1996, 17(4): 433- 454.
  • 3Hyland, K. Hedging in Scientific Research Articles [M]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1998.
  • 4Hyland, K Disciplinary Discourse: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. London: Longman, 2000.
  • 5Hyland, K.What do they mean? Questions in academic writing [J]. Text, 2002 (22) 4: 529-557.
  • 6Koutsantoni, Rhetorical Strategies in Engineering Research Articles and Research Theses: Advanced Academic Literacy and Relations of Power [J]. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2006, 5: 19-36.
  • 7Lakoff, G. Hedges: A Study in Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts [J]. Journal of Philosophical Eogic, 1972, 2: 458-508.
  • 8Prince, E. et al. on Hedging in Physician-physician Discourse [A]. in R.D. Pietro (ed.). Linguistics and Professions [C]. Hillsdale, NJ: Albex, 1982. 83-97.
  • 9Salager Meyer, E Hedges and Textual Communicative Function in Medical English Written Discourse [J]. English for Specific Purposes, 1994, 13 (2): 149-170.
  • 10Silver, M. the Stance of Stance: a Critical Look at Ways Stance is Expressed and Modeled in Academic Discourse [J]. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2003, 2: 359-374.

二级参考文献18

共引文献445

同被引文献14

引证文献1

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部