期刊文献+

成本粘性研究:来自中国上市公司的经验证据 被引量:261

Study on Cost Stickiness
原文传递
导出
摘要 成本粘性是指当成本随着业务量的变动而变动时,其业务量增加时的成本增加量大于业务量等额减少时的成本减少量,这与大多数管理会计教材中传统的成本性态模型认为成本的变动率和业务量变动的对称性是矛盾的。本文通过对我国927家A股上市公司的2001—2005年的数据测试发现:(1)我国上市公司存在着成本粘性;(2)时间范围越长,成本粘性水平越小;(3)成本粘性与业务量的变化幅度有关,随着收入的大幅下降,成本粘性变小;(4)各个行业和公司属性也影响成本粘性水平,资本密集型和劳动密集型公司成本粘性水平较高。 The definition of cost stickiness is that costs increase more with activity increase than they decrease in response to equivalent activity decrease.This sticky cost behavior contradicts the traditional managing accounting model which assumes that costs behave symmetrically for activity increases and decreases.Using a sample of 927 Chinese A-share listed firms during the period 2001-2005,we can find these results :1)there is cost stickiness behavior in Chinese listed firms;2)over a longer accounting period,the level of cost stickiness becomes lower;3)after more decrease of revenue,the level of cost stickiness also drops;4)Firm-specific and industry characteristics also impact on levels of cost stickiness.The data support the notion that cost stickiness is associated with the firms' capital and labor intensity.
出处 《会计研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第11期58-65,共8页 Accounting Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1边喜春.费用“粘性”的成因及控制对策[J].价格月刊,2005(12):82-83. 被引量:40
  • 2孙铮,刘浩.中国上市公司费用“粘性”行为研究[J].经济研究,2004,39(12):26-34. 被引量:479
  • 3Anderson. Mark C. Rajiv D. banker and Surya N. Janakiraman. 2003. Are selling, general, and administrative costs sticky? Journal of Accounting Research. 41 ( 1 ) : 47 - 63
  • 4Balakrishnan, R. Peterson, M. Soderstrom, N. 2004. Does capacity utilization affect the stickiness of costs? [ J ]. Account, Audit and Finance. 19 (3) : 283 -299
  • 5Ball, R. , Kothari, S. , Robin, A. , 2000. The effect of international institutional factors on properties of accounting earnings [J]. Account. Econ. 29 (1):1-51
  • 6Cooper, R. , Kaplan, R. , 1998a. Cost and Effect-Using Integrated Cost Systems to Drive Profitability and Performance. HarvardBusiness School Press, Boston.
  • 7Cooper, R. Kaplan, R. 1998b. The Design of Cost Management Systems-Text and Cases. Prentice Hall Inc. NewJersey
  • 8Gorton G. Schmid F. 2000. Class struggle inside the firm: a study of German co-determination. Working Paper. NBER
  • 9Kenneth Calleja. Michael Steliaros. Dylan C. Thomas. 2006.. A note on cost stickiness: Some international comparisons. Management Accounting Research. 17 : 127 - 140
  • 10La Porta, R. Lopez-De-Silanes, F. Shleifer, A. Vishny, R. 2000. Investor protection and corporate governance [J]. Financial Econ. 58 ( 1 ) : ) - 27

二级参考文献10

  • 1美国财务会计准则委员会(FASB)(娄尔行译).《论财务会计概念》[M].中国财政经济出版社,1992..
  • 2Berle, A A, and Means, G C. 1932, The Modern Corporation and Private Property, New York: Macmillan.
  • 3Cooper, R, and R Kaplan, 1998, The Design of Cost Management System: Text, Cases, and Readings, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • 4Hilton, R. 1997, Managerial Accounting, New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • 5Homgren, C, G Foster and S Datar, 1999, Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • 6Jenson, M C and W H Meckling, 1976, "Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure", Journal of Financial Economics 3 : 305-360.
  • 7Noreen, E and N Soderstrom, 1997, "The Accuracy of Proportional Cost Models : Evidence from Hospital Service Departments", Review of Accounting Studies 2: 89-114.
  • 8Noreen, E, and N Soderstrom, 1994, "Are Overhead Costs Strictly Proportional to Activity? Evidence from Hospital Service Departments", Journal of Accounting and Economics, 17: 255-278.
  • 9Anderson, Mark C, Rajiv D Banker, and Surya N Janakiraman, 2003, "Are Selling, General, and Administrative Costs ' Sticky' ?" Journal of Accounting Research 41 : 47-63.
  • 10Banker, R, and H Johnston, 1993, "An Empirical Study of Cost Drivers in the U.S. Aidine Industry", Accounting Review, 68: 576-601.

共引文献481

同被引文献1837

引证文献261

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部