摘要
轻微暴力索财案件的定性在司法实践中分歧较大,主要集中在抢劫、敲诈勒索与寻衅滋事三个罪名上。定性分歧的主要原因在于立法规定的概括性、理论阐释的局限性、案件事实的复杂性以及法官认识的差异性。要实现对此类案件的准确定性,应该在澄清理论误区的基础上进行综合判断。
There are many viewpoints of nature of slight violent act of asking for money, there are some very dispute claims on three accusations which are rob, blackmail and crime of picking quarrels and provoking troubles. Recapitulative legislation, limitations of theory elaboration, complexity of law case and different cognition are the reasons of disputation We should make decision on the stage of settle academic misunderstandings, if we want to determine nature exactly.
出处
《吉林公安高等专科学校学报》
2007年第6期41-45,共5页
Journal of Jilin Public Secunity Academy
关键词
轻微暴力索财案件
定性
抢劫罪
敲诈勒索罪
寻衅滋事罪
slight violent act of asking for money
determine nature
rob
blackmail
crime of picking quarrels and provoking troubles