摘要
整理国故的主要内容是校勘古籍、考辨史事。整理的对象当然包括那些传统的"高文典册",本身就有沉迷于故纸堆的"嫌疑",再加上整理国故的领军人物胡适等人一再强调其与清代汉学家在研究方法等方面的种种内在关联,事实上未能严格划清与旧学的界限,遂使整理国故与当时社会上出现的种种复古现象之间产生了难以厘清的干系,引起了思想文化界关于整理国故与文化复古现象之间关系的争论。作为"再造文明"的重要手段,整理国故对于复古现象的出现起了推波助澜的作用,但不能因此简单地目之为复古和反动。
The restoration of our heritage in culture involves so many scholars to plunge themselves into piles of ancient books, which impresses laymen that they are culturally reactionary, It gets worse when Hu Shi, one of their pioneers, emphasized the interrelation between their method and the one adopted the scholars in Qing Dynasty. However, they should not be mixed up because cultural restoration is fully necessary for the New Culture Movement in the 1920s.
出处
《广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
2007年第5期120-125,共6页
Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
整理国故
文化复古
新文化阵营
胡适
Cultural heritage restoration
cultural reaction
New Culture Movement
Hu Shi
