摘要
在路遥作品20余年的接受史上,存在着这样令人困惑的矛盾现象:一方面,路遥受到广大读者热烈持久的欢迎以及批评家普遍的认可;另一方面,路遥又长期受到文学史家不同程度的冷落与忽视。因此,有必要带着"问题意识",对路遥及其小说的美学价值重新进行文学史意义上的阅读:考察路遥已有的文学史"状况",探析路遥应有的文学史"位置"。只有抓住作品"客观事实"这个文学史的核心,才能尽量减少或避免特定文学史观与意识形态所造成的文学史误读,降低文学史的疏漏与缺憾,更为全面、客观的文学史书写才会成为可能。
There is a confusing phenomenon on the acceptance of Lu Yao's works during the process of more than two decades: on one hand, his works had a team of enthusiastic followers and had been generally recognized by the majority of critics ; while on the other hand, his works had been ignored and treated coldly by the literary history writers. So it is essential to set our eyes on Lu Yao's significance in literary history from an aesthetic value with the "problem consciousness", and to make a study on Lu Yao's "status quo" in literary history and to explore his "position" which he should have deserved in literary history. Only by grasping the core of "objective facts" can we reduce and avoid to its greatest extent the specific literary history reviews and the misinterpretation of literary history, to bring down the amount of mistakes and regrets, therefore, to make it possible for an all-round and more objective literary history writing.
出处
《闽江学院学报》
2007年第6期114-121,共8页
Journal of Minjiang University
关键词
路遥
文学史
文学史观
文学史客观标准
Lu Yao
literary history
literary history opinion
objective standard of literary history