期刊文献+

批判性思维和论证批判 被引量:9

Critical Thinking and Critique of Argument
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对批判性思维的不同解释其实也有诸多共同点。培养批判性思维能力和气质的主要手段是非形式逻辑或论证逻辑。在论证实践中,论证批判是批判性思维的最集中的体现。论证批判的原则包括可攻击性原则、对等原则、逻辑中立性原则和区别原则。批判可选择不同的时机。对批判有不同的反应。对批判合理的反应可能产生某些不同的效果。 In fact, in various interpretations of critical thinking there are some common ground . The main means to cultivate skills and dispositions of critical thinking are informal logic or logic of argument. In practice of argumentation, critique of argument is best of all embodiment. The principle of critique of argument includes principle of vulnerability , principle of parity , principle of discrimination and principle of logical neutrality. The different opportunity to critique can be chosen . There are various reaction to critique . The rational reaction to critique may produce some different effect.
出处 《河池学院学报》 2007年第6期6-11,共6页 Journal of Hechi University
关键词 批判性思维 论辩实践 非形式逻辑 论证批判 论证评估 critical thinking practice of argumentation informal Logic critique of argument evaluation of argument
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1[1]Milos Jenicek and David L.Hitchcock.Evidence-based practice:logic and critical thinking in medicine[M].Chicago:AMA Press,2005.
  • 2[2]Claude Gratton.Common Pedagogical Weaknesses in Critical Thinking Textbooks and Courses[A].Hans V.Hansen,Christopher W.Tindale,J.Anthony Blair and Ralph H.Johnson(eds.).Proceedings of the 2001 Ossa Conference:Argumentation and Its Applications[C].0ntario:Informal Logic.2001.
  • 3[3]Fans H.van Eemeren,Rob Grootendorst and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans.Foundamentals of Argumentation Theory:A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments[M].New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,Inc.1996.
  • 4[4]David Hitchcock.The practice of argumentative discussion[J].Argumentation,Vol.16(2002),No.3.pp.287-298.
  • 5[5]Ralph H.Johnson.Manifest Rationalty:A Pragmatic Theory of Argument[M].New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,Inc.,2000.
  • 6[6]Hengameh Irandoust.The Logic of Critique[J].Argumentation.Vol.20(2006).No.2.pp.133-148.
  • 7[7]Niels M? ller Nielsen.Counter Argument:In Defence of Common Sense[D].Department of Languages and Culture Roskilde University.June,2000.

同被引文献32

引证文献9

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部