期刊文献+

雅俗之变的重要个案——花雅之争透析 被引量:1

An Important Case in the Change of Elegance and Vulgarity:Analysis on Controversy of the Hua and Ya
下载PDF
导出
摘要 花雅之争是戏曲史上长期关注的一个话题,论文以禁戏为切入点,对花雅之争重新探讨。和前人统而论之有所不同,主要从清廷、地方文人士大夫、地方行政人员、普通民众几个不同的接受群体分开来谈。将花雅之争放在清朝文字狱的大背景下,着力指出各接受群体在花雅之争的过程中所发挥的不同作用,尤其是清廷和地方政府在禁戏方面的相同和相异之处,并且尝试对民众的文化欣赏水平做出定位。以期在分析花雅之争这个雅俗之变个案的同时,对文学发展中的主客观因素、偶然因素和必然因素有进一步的认识。 The controversy of the Hua and Ya is a perennial topic in Chinese dramatic history. This paper starts from the study on "theater ban", and researches the controversy of the Hua and Ya. Different from the former studies, the paper discusses the Court of Qing Dynasty, local intellectuals, local officials and common people from different acceptance groups. It puts the controversy of the Hua and Ya in the background of literary inquisition, points out different effect of different accepter in the process of the controversy of the Hua and Ya, especially the sameness and dissimilarity of Court and local government on "theatre ban", and tries to orientate the cultural appreciation level of the masses. The paper hopes to have a further understanding on subjective and objective factor, accident factor and necessary factor while analyses the controversy of the Hua and Ya.
作者 张勇风
出处 《重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版)》 2008年第1期83-89,共7页 Journal of Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Science Edition)
关键词 花雅之争 禁戏 雅俗之变 文字狱 controversy of the Hua and Ya theatre ban change of elegance and vulgarity literary inquisition
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1[5]张书才.纂修四库全书档案:上[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1997.
  • 2周育德.中国戏曲文化[M].北京:中国友谊出版公司,1995..
  • 3[5]焦循.花部农谭[M]//中国古典戏曲论著集成(八).北京:中国戏剧出版社,1959:225.
  • 4[11][清]陈森.品花宝鉴:上[M].北京:中国文史出版社,2003:32.

共引文献8

同被引文献1

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部