期刊文献+

WTO义务减让表的解释问题 被引量:3

On the Interpretation of the Schedule of Concession in WTO
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文论述WTO减让表的法律解释问题。专家组和上诉机构对减让表的解释仅仅局限于《维也纳条约法公约》31、32、33条的运用,而忽略了减让表谈判、草拟、缔结的单边性,导致减让表的解释面临重重困境。本文梳理了专家组、上诉机构在个案中解释减让表的具体步骤,指出减让表解释目前面临困境的根源,提出减让表解释可以援用其他的解释方法。减让表解释的研究意义主要在于开阔眼界,认识到发挥WTO裁判机构司法能动性的重要意义,促进法律解释学的发展以及国际法最终体系化的发展。 This article addresses the interpretation of the Schedule of Concession in WTO. The panel and the appellate body limit their interpretation only to application of articles 31,32,33of VCLT, but ignore or neglect the unilateral nature of the Schedule in terms of their negotiation, drafting and conclusion, leading the interpretation to difficult situation. This article sets out the steps of panel and appellate body from the cases they dealt, finds out the causes why the interpretation face difficulties, and argues that other methods such as in interpreting a unilateral declaration. Research on the interpretation of the schedule can broaden our horizon and realizing the importance of judicial activism, and eventually promoting the development of legal interpretation and systemizing of international law.
作者 那力 肖夏
机构地区 吉林大学法学院
出处 《当代法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第1期127-133,共7页 Contemporary Law Review
关键词 WTO义务减让表 条约解释 《维也纳条约法公约》 schedule of concession interpretation of treaty VCLT
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Isabelle Van Damme. The Interpretation of Schedules of Commitments [J]. Journal of World Trade, 2007 (3).
  • 2Duncan French. Treaty interpretation and the incorporation of extraneous legal rules [ J ]. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, vol. 55, 2006 (4).
  • 3Campbell Mclachlan. The Principle of Systemic Integration and Article 31 (3) (c) of The Vieena Convetion [J]. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, vol. 54, 2005 (4).
  • 4John H. Jackson, William J. Davey, Alan O. Sykes. Legal Problems of International Economic Relations [ M ]. 4th ed, 2002, and 2007 updated ed.
  • 5国际法委员会报告,57届会议.
  • 6约斯特,鲍威林.国际公法规则之冲突[M].北京:法律出版社,2005.
  • 7Appellate Body Reports, EC - Sugar Subsidies, p. 223.
  • 8Appellate Body Reports, EC- Sugar Subsidies, p. 167.
  • 9Appellate Body Reports, US- Gambling Services, 192页.
  • 10Appellate Body Reports, EC - Computer Equipment, 265页.

同被引文献28

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部