英美刑事证据法的发展理路及现代检视——对达马斯卡《漂移的证据法》的批判性解读被引量：3

The Development Venation of Anglo-American Criminal Evidence Law and Modern Inspection:Unscrambling Critically Damaska’s Evidence Law Adrift

原文传递

导出

摘要证据法的发展走向是西方尤其是英美法学界近年来讨论的焦点和热点。《漂移的证据法》因运用比较方法对英美证据法的三大制度性支柱及其转变的现实进行精湛的分析而赢得了广泛赞誉,但对英美证据发展走向的悲观主义结论又使得这种赞誉大打折扣。从历史维度和现实逻辑来看,英美刑事证据法不会像达马斯卡所说的那样"崩溃"和"不可预测"。 The development orientation of evidence law is the focus and hotspot the western especially Anglo-American scholars discuss recently. Evidence Law Adrift obtains comprehensive recognition as a result of analyzing exquisitely, three institutional pillars of Anglo-American evidence law and their transformation in virtue of comparison, but this recognition is discounted greatly because of pessimistic conclusion on the development orientation of Anglo-American evidence law. This article inspects the theoretic foundation and institutional frame from the historical and realistic angles, and unscrambles critically Damaska＇ s standpoint about the development of evidence law, thereout educes the conclusion that Anglo-American criminal evidence law isn＇ t on the rocks and unforecastable as Damaska said, thereby further approaches the development orientation of Anglo-American evidence law.

作者唐芳

机构地区西华师范大学法学院

出处《法制与社会发展》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第1期151-160,共10页 Law and Social Development

关键词英美刑事证据法达马斯卡理论根基制度构架发展走向 Anglo-American criminal evidence law Damaska theoretic foundation institutional frame development orientation

分类号 D915.3 [政治法律—诉讼法学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献37

1[美]米尔建·R·达马斯卡李学军译.漂移的证据法[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003..
2[英]卡尔·波普尔．开放社会及其敌人[M]．郑一明，李惠斌，等译．北京：中国社会科学出版社，1999：158.
3孙孝福,郭松.证据制度与理性:一种历史主义的维度[A].何家弘.证据学论坛:第七卷[C].北京:中国检察出版社,2003.
4Richard D. Friedman. Anchors and Flotsam: Is Evidence Law "Adrift" [J]. Yale Law Journal 1998, (107).
5Alan Macfarlane. The Origins of English Individualism : The Family, Property, and Social Transition [ M ]. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1978.
6[德]康德苗力田.道德形而上学原理[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1986..
7Nora V. Demleitner. More Than "Just" Evidence: Reviewing Mirjan Damaska' s Evidence Law Adrift [ J ]. American Journal of Comparative Law , 1999, (47).
8易延友.英美证据法的历史与哲学考察[J].中外法学,2004,16(3):257-283. 被引量：6
9John H. Langbein. Historical Foundation of the Law of Evidence : a View From the Ryder Sources [ J ]. Columbia Law Review, 1996, (96).
10James Bradley Thayer. A Preliminary Treatise on Evidence at Common Law [ M ]. New York: Augustus M. Kelley, 1969.

二级参考文献297

1Thayer,Evidence,P.47.
2Anon.Geoffrey Gilbert,The Law of Evidence,Dublin,1754.
3John H. Langbein,supra note 1, p. 1172.
4John H. Dmgbein, supra note 1, pp. 1171-1202.
5See John H.Langbein, supra note 1, p. 1171.
6See Beakdey Peerage Case(1811) 4 Camp. 401. See.from, W. R. Cornish, The Jury, p. 84.
7Michelson v. United States, 335 U.S. 469, 475-476 (1948).
8Damaska,Supra note 3, p. 514.
9John H. Langbein, supra note 1, p. 1169.
10John H. Langbein, Historical Foundations of the Law of Evidence: A View from the Ryder Sources, in 85 Gohrm. L. Rev.,1996, p. 1168.