期刊文献+

癌症患者生命质量测定量表体系之大肠癌量表QLICP-CR的研制 被引量:34

Development of the System of Quality of Life Instruments for Cancer Patients:Colorectal Cancer (QLICP-CR)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 背景与目的:癌症患者生命质量测定量表体系(quality of life instrumentsfor cancer patients,QLICP)共性模块的研制已有报道,本研究在此基础上将研制大肠癌患者生命质量测定量表(QLICP-colorectal cancer,QLICP-CR)。方法:采用量表开发的程序化决策方式研制适合中国文化背景下使用的QLICP-CR,并通过110例大肠癌患者的生存质量测定对量表进行评价。采用统计描述、相关分析、配对t检验和聚类分析等进行统计学处理。结果:总量表及各个领域的重测相关系数均在0.78以上;各领域内部一致性信度的α值除社会功能及共性症状和副作用领域分别为0.66、0.63外,其余均在0.85以上;各条目与其领域的相关均大于与其它领域的相关,相关系数r值大多都在0.6以上;总量表、共性模块、特异模块、心理功能及共性症状和副作用领域得分均显示治疗前后差异有统计学意义。结论:QLICP-CR具有较好的信度、效度及反应度,可作为我国大肠癌患者生命质量的测评工具。 BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Based on the development of the general module of the system of quality of life instruments for cancer patients (QLICP-GM), this study was to develop and evaluate a quality of life scale for patients with colorectal cancer (QLICP-CR). METHODS: A quality of life scale for colorectal cancer patients that associated with Chinese cultural background was developed. The data from 110 patients with colorectal cancer were analyzed using statistical description, Pearson Correlation, Cluster analysis, and paired t-student test to assess the instrument. RESULTS: The test-retest reliability for the scale and 5 domains were all above 0.78. Internal consistency cc for each domain was higher than 0.85 except for the social domain (0.66) and the symptom and side effect domain (0.63). Most of the correlation coefficients between each item and its domains were above 0.6. The differences in the scores of overall scale, general module, special domain, psychological domain, and symptom and side effect domain between pre-treatment and post-treatment were significant. CONCLUSION. The QLICP-CR is reasonably valid, reliable, and responsible, and can be used to assess quality of life for the patients with colorectal cancer.
出处 《癌症》 SCIE CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第1期96-100,共5页 Chinese Journal of Cancer
基金 云南省自然科学基金(No.99C0016G)~~
关键词 大肠肿瘤 生命质量 量表 Colorectal neoplasm Quality of life Instrument
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Lindholm E, Berglund B, Kewenter J, et al. Worry associated with screening for colorectal carcinomas [J]. Scand J Gastroenterol, 1997,32(3 ) : 238-245.
  • 2史兆歧,胡伯虎.大肠肛门疾病回答[M].北京:科学技术文献出版社,1986:144-157.
  • 3Bekkers M J, Van Knippenberg F, Van den Borne H W, et al. Survival and psychological adjustment to stoma surgery and non-stoma bowel resection: a 4-year follow-up [J]. J Psychosom Res, 1997,42( 3 ) : 235-244.
  • 4万崇华,罗家洪,张灿珍,汤学良,陈明清,宋元龙,张晓磬,蔡乐,许传志,李晓梅,周梅,黄莹,卢玉波,张冬梅.癌症患者生命质量测定量表体系研究[J].中国行为医学科学,2003,12(3):341-342. 被引量:72
  • 5万崇华,孟琼,罗家洪,汤学良,张灿珍,卢玉波,杨铮,张晓磬.癌症患者生命质量测定量表体系共性模块的研制(一):条目筛选及共性模块的形成[J].癌症,2007,26(2):113-117. 被引量:66
  • 6万崇华,孟琼,杨铮,汤学良,张灿珍,卢玉波,罗家洪,张晓磬.癌症患者生命质量测定量表体系共性模块的研制 (二):信度与效度分析[J].癌症,2007,26(3):225-229. 被引量:57
  • 7杨铮,卢玉波,李云峰,万崇华,罗家洪,孟琼,张晓罄.大肠癌患者生命质量测定量表FACT-C(V4.0)中文版应用评价[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2007,11(43):8753-8756. 被引量:39
  • 8Sprangers M A, te Velde A, Aaronson N K. The construction and testing of the EORTC Colorectal Cancer-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire Module (QLQ-CR38). European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Study Group on Quality of Life[J]. Eur J Cancer. 1999.35(2):238-247.
  • 9Ward W L, Hahn E A, Mo F, et al. Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT-C) quality of life instrument [J]. Qual Life Res, 1999,8(3):181-195.
  • 10Husted J A, Cook R J, Farewell V T, et al. Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations [J]. J Clin Epidem, 2000,53(5):459-468.

二级参考文献50

共引文献200

同被引文献429

引证文献34

二级引证文献319

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部