期刊文献+

计算机软件法律保护

Legal Protection of Computer Software
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对计算机软件的法律保护有必要从依赖传统法律体系保护向建立新型法律制度保护过渡。对计算机软件的保护应从传统知识产权法体系中汲取营养,同时应体现软件自身的特点和顺应软件产业发展的需要,我国应为这个转变贡献自己的力量。对计算机软件保护特别法律制度的建立同样有助于对集成电路布图等新型知识产权的保护开辟道路。 It is necessary for the legal protection of computer software to transit from the traditional dependence on the legal system to a new legal system. The protection of computer software should rely on the traditional intellectual property law system ;meanwhile,it should reflect the characteristics of software and meet the requirement of the development of the software industry. China should contribute its efforts to this change. The establishment of the special legal protection of computer software can also contribute to the protection of new intellectual property such as integrated circuit layout.
出处 《河北理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2008年第1期60-63,共4页 Journal of Hebei Polytechnic University:Social Science Edition
关键词 计算机软件 知识产权 法律保护 computer software intellectual property legal protection
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献22

  • 1李贵方.论计算机软件的专利保护[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),1993,15(2):49-54. 被引量:1
  • 2[3]European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the patentability of computer-implemented inventions (COM (2002) 92-C5-0082/2002-2002/0047 (COD)),(Co-decision procedure:first reading),P5 TA-PROV(2003)0402
  • 3[4]John Love.Examination practice at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO),International ForumProtection of Computer-Related and Business Model Inventions,Munich,2002,11.
  • 4[7]Gottschalk v.Benson,409 U.S.63 (1972).
  • 5[8]Parker v.Flook,437 U.S.584 (1978).
  • 6[9]Diamond v.Diehr,450 U.S.175 (1981).
  • 7[10]1994年至1995年之间CAFC连续做出7件与软件专利有关的判决,分别是:In re Schrader,22 F.3d 290(1994);In re Alappat,33 F.3d 1526 (1994);In re Warmerdam,33 F.3d 1354 (1994);In re Lowry,32 USPQ 2d,1031(1994);In re Trovato,33 USPQ 2d 1994 (1994);In re Beauregard,order,No.95 1054 (1995);In re Fraenkel,order,No.94-1217(1995).
  • 8[11]Guidelines for Examination in the European Patent Office,2004年12月最新修订,C-Ⅳ,2.1-2.3.http://www.european-patent-office.org/legal/gui_lines/e/index.2004-5-17(EPO网站)
  • 9[12]State Street Bank & Trust Co.v.Signature Financial Group Inc.,47 USPQ 2d.1596 (Fed.Cir.1998),cert.Denied (US 1999) No.98-657
  • 10[13]AT&T Corp.v.Excel Communications Inc.,59 USPQ 2d 1429 (Fed.Cir.1999) cert.Denied,68 USLW 3249 (1999)

共引文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部