期刊文献+

诉讼本质之思辨——从探求真相到实现程序正义的内在逻辑 被引量:10

Study on the Essence of Litigation——The Internal Logic from Searching Fact to Realizing Procedural Justice
下载PDF
导出
摘要 诉讼发生的前提是纠纷当事者自行探求真相解决纠纷的困难性,即自行解决纠纷的各种途径功能较弱。诉讼从民间、政府到法院发展的内在逻辑是揭示真相能力的逐步提升。诉讼程序公正的内在力量是为探索真相而追求的程序自治性,即对纠纷天然求真格局的固定。诉讼程序独立的实质是程序真实先于而不是优于实体真实,它是对诉讼程序公正的发展。诉讼效率是诉讼程序从理想到现实的桥梁。诉讼公正与效率调和基本路径的思路是通过维持与扩大诉讼结构的方法提升诉讼效率,另一种思路是作为主要途径的简化诉讼结构。 The premise of litigation is the difficulty to settle dissensions by themselves for two parties, which means this function of solution is rather feeble. The development of litigation, from private action to government to court, is the advance of the function for posting fact. The power of procedural justice is the procedural autonomy for fact, which is the fastness of pattern to searching fact. As the main aspect of procedural justice, procedural independence, which essence is procedural reality is prior to rather than excelled substantial reality is the development of justice. The efficiency is the bridge from ideality to realism for litigation. One way to attempting justice and efficiency is to advance the efficiency of litigation by keeping and extending structure of litigation. The other main way is to predigest structure of litigation.
作者 马贵翔
机构地区 复旦大学法学院
出处 《甘肃政法学院学报》 CSSCI 2008年第1期18-27,共10页 Journal of Gansu Political Science and Law Institute
关键词 纠纷 程序公正 程序自治 诉讼效率 路径 dissension searching fact procedural justice procedural autonomy efficiency of litigation way
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1[美]约翰 罗尔斯 何怀宏 译.正义论[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988..
  • 2[法]勒内.达维德.当代主要法律体系[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1983:337
  • 3邱联恭.司法现代化与程序法[M].台北:三民书局.1992:277-278.
  • 4[美]波斯纳.法律之经济分析[M].美国Little Brown公司,1972:1.
  • 5[美]阿瑟.奥肯.平等与效率[M].北京:华夏出版社,1999:3-4.
  • 6季卫东.法律程序的意义——对中国法制建设的另一种思考[J].中国社会科学,1993(1):83-103. 被引量:745

二级参考文献16

  • 1John Rawls.A Theory of Justice,1971.
  • 2Lawrence M Friedman.A History of American Law,1985.
  • 3Gunther Teubner."Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Law"Law and Society Review,1983.
  • 4MilsomSF.
  • 5Michael D.Bayles.Procedural Justice, Allocating to Individuals,1990.
  • 6J.Habermas.The Theory of Communicative Action,1987.
  • 7O. F. Robinsom and others.An Introduction to European Legal History,1985.
  • 8A. Engelmann and others.A History of Continental Civil Procedure,1927.
  • 9Morton J Horwitz.The transformation of American law,1977.
  • 10Justice William O.Douglas’s Comment in Joint Anti – Fascist Refugee Comm. v. Mcgrath, see United States Supreme Court Reports (95 Law. Ed. Oct. 1950 Term),1951.

共引文献827

同被引文献79

引证文献10

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部