期刊文献+

美国言论自由之民意基础实证考察 被引量:4

A Practical Survey of the Present Condition of Freedom of Speech in the United States
下载PDF
导出
摘要 实证考察表明,美国绝大多数公民在理论上崇尚言论自由,但在实践中却并非如此。美国之所以成为世界上言论自由保障程度最高的国家,这既与美国的自由主义政治、文化、法律传统相关联,又与美国司法界、学术界对言论自由价值的日益重视以及新闻媒体的身体力行密不可分。针对现实生活中存在的某些充满道德与法律争议的言论,多数美国公民的否定性态度与司法、学术和新闻传媒领域的主流群体所秉持的宽容与开放的立场,形成了评判美国言论自由事业的两个关键性支点和衡平力量。在美国宪政框架内,美国特色之言论自由事业的快车将驶向何方,值得中外学界不断关注与研究。 A series of practical surveys have revealed that most American citizens theoretically value freedom of speech; however, in practice it is not likely. The main reason why freedom of speech enjoys the highest level of protection in the United States can be found in two aspects: one is the perennial tradition of American liberalist politics, culture and law; the other is the growing concern of the judicature and the academic circle over the value of free speech as well as the unremitting and daring efforts made by the media. As to some expressions laden with legal and moral controversies, the negative attitude of the majority of citizens and the tolerance held by the dominant forces of the judicature, the academic circle and the media have con stituted two crucial poles of evaluation and balance of the cause of freedom of speech. In what direction is the express train of freedom of speech going within the American constitutional structure really deserves the close and constant attention and research of the academic circles home and abroad.
作者 高中 何亚平
机构地区 湖南大学法学院
出处 《甘肃政法学院学报》 CSSCI 2008年第1期105-111,共7页 Journal of Gansu Political Science and Law Institute
基金 2006年湖南省哲学社会科学基金项目<国家安全与表达自由比较研究>(项目编号:06YB15)阶段性研究成果
关键词 美国宪法第一修正案 宪政 言论自由 激进言论 民意调查 the First Amendment of American Constitution constitutionalism freedom speech, public polls speech radical
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Hazel Erskine. The Polls: Freedom of Speech [J]. Public Opinion Quarterly. volume 34, Columbia University Press. 1995 :483-496.
  • 2Sandra Coliver. Secrecy and Liberty: National Security, Freedom of Expression and Access to Information [M]. The Hague: Kluwer Law International. 1999 : 109.
  • 3邱小平.表达自山:美国第一修正案研究[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2005:186.
  • 4George Garneau. Some Editors Say Press Should Not Be So Free [N]. New York: Editor & Publisher. Vol. 12, Iss. 18.04-05-1991:17.
  • 5Patrick Leahy. The public's Right to Know Is under Attack [N]. The Associated Press State & Local Wire. 13-03-2005 (18).
  • 6William Glaberson. Government Has Power to Curb Some Freedoms [N]. New York: New York Times, 19-09-2001 (7).
  • 7高中.后9.11时代西方法治社会面临的挑战[J].政治与法律,2004(5):39-46. 被引量:13
  • 8罗山.美国受到世界仇恨,亵渎古兰经事件并非关键[N].新京报,2005-05-22.
  • 9Hazel Erskine. The Polls:Freedom of Speech [M]. Public Opinion Quarterly. volume 34. Columbia University Press, 1970:483-496
  • 10Free Speech Yearbook 1995 [M]. Volume 33, Southern Illibois University Press, Carbondale and Edwardsville, 1996: 152--168.

二级参考文献59

  • 1(美)彼得·弗伦奇 (美)阿兰·S·罗森鲍姆编 郑戈等译.《宪政和军事司法:从军事司法中寻求公正》[A].(美)阿兰·S·罗森鲍姆编,郑戈等译.《宪政的哲学之维》[C].三联书店,2001年12月..
  • 2(英)丹宁勋爵 刘庸安译.《法律的界碑》,第六篇第二章“国家安全”[M].群众出版社,1992年12月第2版..
  • 3.[EB/OL].http: //www. usdoj. gov/ag/speeches/2001/agerisisremarks10 25. htm,.
  • 4Bruce Ackerman, Don't Panic, London Review Books, Feb. 7, 2002, p15.
  • 5Ian Brownlie, Interrogation in Depth: The Compton and Parker Reports, 35 Modem Law Review, 2002.
  • 6Frederick Schauer, Exceptions, 58 U CHI L REV, 1991, pp871- 872.
  • 7Proclamation No. 7463, 66 Fed Reg 48, 199, Sept. 14, 2001.
  • 8Mike Alien & Sleven Mufson, U S. Seizes Assets of 3 Islamic Groups: U S Charity Among Institutions Accused Of Funding Hamas,WASH. POST, Dec 5, 2001, p A1.
  • 9Kwong Hai Chew, 344 u s 590, 596(1953).
  • 10Mathews v. Diaz, 426 u s 67.77(1976).

共引文献15

同被引文献26

引证文献4

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部