期刊文献+

论商事仲裁司法监督的合理范围

The Reasonable Scope of Judicial Supervision in Commercial Arbitration
下载PDF
导出
摘要 公正与效率是仲裁的两大价值目标。仲裁的自治性要求效率优先,影响了仲裁的公正,司法监督的目的正是为了实现公正价值。然而过度的司法监督却不利于仲裁效率的实现。因此,合理的司法监督只能是适度监督,充分尊重当事人意思自治,严格限制仲裁监督于程序事项。 Justice and efficiency are the two major value objects of arbitration. Excessive arbitration autonomy will resuh in the failure to achieve the justice. While excessive judicial supervision will impede the realization of the efficiency of arbitration. So judicial supervision should be limited appropriately in the scope of procedural matters, with full respect for parties' autonomy.
作者 栗明 周春华
出处 《东华理工学院学报(社会科学版)》 2007年第4期378-380,共3页 Journal of East China Institute of Technology
基金 抚州市社会科学课题"仲裁程序的自治和管制的平衡"(06sk71)
关键词 仲裁自治 司法监督 公正 效率 arbitration autonomy judicial supervision justice efficiency
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献49

  • 1FToschi.
  • 2John Rawls.A Theory of Justice,1971.
  • 3Lawrence M Friedman.A History of American Law,1985.
  • 4David E Aptei.The Politics of Modernization,1985.
  • 5MKucharska et al.
  • 6Frank K.Upham.Law and Social Change in Postwar Japan,1987.
  • 7Joseph A Schumpeter.Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy,1976.
  • 8Morton J Horwitz.The transformation of American law,1977.
  • 9Charles A Miller.The Forest of Due Process of Law:The American Constitution TraditionDue Process(NOMOS XVIII),1977.
  • 10Cover, R.M,&Fiss, O.M,&. Resnik,J.Procedure,1988.

共引文献915

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部