期刊文献+

语法表征的齐整模式与语言运用的家族相似

Neat Patterns of Grammar Representation & Family Resemblance of Language Usage
下载PDF
导出
摘要 语言本质上是音义结合的符号形成的自足的形式系统,每个语法范畴都有其清晰的定义性界限。以"家族相似"呈现的跨范畴语法现象大多是由历时性的或然因素所致。语法能力是言语者无意识的静态知识系统,其表征内化于人的大脑中,并决定着语言运用的动态性操作。语法表征的有序性是语言符号的系统性使然,而抽象思维正是基于人类操作语言符号的能力。 Language is by nature a self-contained formal system of linguistic signs, which are combinations of sound and meaning. Each and every grammatical category has its defining boundary. Cross-category phenomena, taking the appearance of family resemblance, are mostly brought about by historical factors of probability. Grammat- ical competence can be characterized as knowledge system, which is static and beyond the speakers' conscious awareness. Representational rules are internalized in human brains and regulate the dynamic operation of language system. The orderliness of grammar representation reflects the systematicity of linguistic signs, and human's abstract-thinking capacity originates from the ability to manipulate linguistic signs. While language evolution is motivated by both internal and external factors, what is encoded by grammar is what is internally essential to language system. The effects of space-time factors of probability upon grammar representation brings insignificant changes to the nature of language. It is somewhat rash for Wittegenstein Ⅱ, on the argument of family resemblance of linguistic phenomena, to denounce the patterned orderliness of grammar representation.
作者 马志刚
出处 《广州大学学报(社会科学版)》 2007年第12期67-70,共4页 Journal of Guangzhou University:Social Science Edition
关键词 语法表征 齐整模式 语言运用 家族相似 grammar representation neat patterns language usage family resemblance
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1维特根斯坦.逻辑哲学论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1962.97.
  • 2维特根斯坦.哲学研究[M].北京:商务印书馆,1996.48、49、53、51.
  • 3[3]FODOR J A.The Modularity of Mind[M].Cambridge,MA:MIT Press,1983.
  • 4[4]PINKER S.Words and Rules:The Ingredients of Language[M].New York:Basic Books,1999.
  • 5[5]CHOMSKY N.The Minimalist Program[M].Cambridge,MA:MIT Press,1995.
  • 6[8]马庆株,项开喜.二十世纪的中国现代语法学[C]∥二十世纪的中国语言学.北京:北京大学出版社,1998.
  • 7[9]HUANG J.Logical Form[M]∥WEBELHUTH G.Government and Binding Theory and the Minimalist Program.Oxford:Blackwell,1994.
  • 8周国光.对“中心语理论和汉语的DeP”一文的质疑[J].当代语言学,2005,7(2):139-147. 被引量:49
  • 9周绍珩.马丁内的语言功能观和语言经济原则[J].当代语言学,1980(4):4-12. 被引量:86
  • 10司富珍.中心语理论和汉语的DeP[J].当代语言学,2004,6(1):26-34. 被引量:126

二级参考文献8

共引文献363

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部