摘要
柯尔施明确地提出和讨论马克思主义和哲学的关系问题,这是他的功绩。但是他的讨论完全掩盖了马克思、恩格斯反对哲学的真实意义。马克思、恩格斯反对哲学、不用"哲学"这一术语来指称自己的有关理论是一个事实,它表明了马克思、恩格斯科学研究立场的一种根本转变:从站在哲学基地上、从原则出发去研究现实转变为从现实出发进行科学研究、得出对现实事物的认识。马克思、恩格斯肯定自己有新世界观,如果我们明确地将"哲学"规定为世界观理论,就仍然可以讲马克思主义有哲学。但是,在恢复"哲学"这个用语的时候,确实存在着回复到马克思、恩格斯所反对的哲学立场的严重倾向,这是我们应当反对和防止的。
Explicitly Korsch proposed the discussed the relation between Marxism and philosophy, which is one of his exploits. However, his discussion has completely covered the true meaning of Marx and Engel's opposition against philosophy. Marx and Engel's opposition against philosophy and refusal to use philosophy to refer to their theories showed that their research had turned from principle-to-reality to reality-to-knowledge. Surely Marx and Engel had their own world outlook. If we explicitly take 'philosophy' as the theory of world outlook, we can say that Marx is a philosophy. However, when coming to the term of philosophy, a serious tendency if we turn to the philosophy that they had opposed to, which should be prohibited.
出处
《毛泽东邓小平理论研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2007年第12期36-43,共8页
Studies on Mao Zedong and Deng Xiaoping Theories