2BRODY T. Evaluating research impact through open access to scholarly communication [ D ]. Doctoral dissertation, Univer- sity of Southampton, 2006.
3BJORK B C. A model of scientific communication as a global distributed information system [ J ]. Information Research, 2006, 12 (2): 296-296.
4HOUGHTON J, RASMUSSEN B, SHEEHAN P, et al. Eco- nomic implications of alternative scholarly publishing models: exploring the costs and benefits [ EB/OL]. [ 2015-09-03 ]. ht- tp://vuir, vu. edu. au/15222/1/EI-ASPM_Report, pdf.
5STARK D, AITCHISON J, STARK D, et al. Words in the mind: an introduction to the mental lexicon [J]. Language, 1996, 72: 362-363.
6HURD. The transformation of scientific communication : a model for 2020 [ J ]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 2000, 51 (14): 1279-1283.
7WHITE H D. Scientific communication and literature [ J ]. Handbook of Research Synthesis Russell Sage Foundation, 1994 (3).
8NELSON D. The uptake of electronic journals by academics in the UK, their attitudes towards them and their potential impact on scholarly communication [ J]. Information Services & Use, 2001, 21 (3): 205-214.
9DULLE F W, MINISHI-MAJANJA M K. Fostering open access publishing in Tanzanian public universities: policy makers' perspectives[J]. Agricultural Information Worldwide, 2009, 2 (3), 129-136.
10LASSWELL H. The structure and function of communication in society [ J ]. L Bryson the Communication of Ideas, 1948, 37 : 215-228.
